98 N/A Bonneville 0-60 in 7.3???
#1
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
98 N/A Bonneville 0-60 in 7.3???
Hi
I was bored so I was looking at this site with 0-60 times
http://www.albeedigital.com/superco.../0-60times.html
I saw my car and it has a 0-60 of 7.3? That must be a typo right? More like 8.3 maybe?
Bonnevilles are big cars and I figure thats typo
1998 Pontiac Bonneville SE 7.3 15.5
1995 Chevrolet Camaro 3800 7.4 15.7
1999 Ford Mustang Convertible V6 8.6 16.5
Seems a bit quick to me. Dont race though so I dont know.
I was bored so I was looking at this site with 0-60 times
http://www.albeedigital.com/superco.../0-60times.html
I saw my car and it has a 0-60 of 7.3? That must be a typo right? More like 8.3 maybe?
Bonnevilles are big cars and I figure thats typo
1998 Pontiac Bonneville SE 7.3 15.5
1995 Chevrolet Camaro 3800 7.4 15.7
1999 Ford Mustang Convertible V6 8.6 16.5
Seems a bit quick to me. Dont race though so I dont know.
#4
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now that I about it 8'* sound right.
I know the average Civic Ricer is in the 9'* and I play around with them(dont we all) nothing major but they seem real slow.
I know the average Civic Ricer is in the 9'* and I play around with them(dont we all) nothing major but they seem real slow.
#10
Senior Member
True Car Nut
I'd say low 8'* 0-60. The Series 2 is a good engine. I've driven a 96 Regal and that car could move. I find the Series 2 NA to be quiker than the Ser 1 NA. However, the Ser 1 I had was geared at 2.84. Most NA Bonnevilles have 3.06. Now I have a ser 2 L67 which is the quickest car i've driven.