IT'S HERE, IT'S HERE!
#1
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IT'* HERE, IT'* HERE!
DSC01137.jpg
intel quad core q6700
windows vista home premium
intel dg33tl replaced with an Asus P5K-E wifi-ap edition
intel quad core q6700
windows vista home premium
intel dg33tl replaced with an Asus P5K-E wifi-ap edition
#6
Senior Member
True Car Nut
too bad that most apps/games cant fully take advantage of multiple CPU threads.
For the average user, you are generally better off for home/gaming use in getting the fastest dual core processor with the most cache rather than a quad core at this point.
Why not to get a quad core processor:
in a business/application enviroment....
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.c...253467,00.html
for gaming...
http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquir...less-for-games
For the average user, you are generally better off for home/gaming use in getting the fastest dual core processor with the most cache rather than a quad core at this point.
Why not to get a quad core processor:
in a business/application enviroment....
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.c...253467,00.html
for gaming...
http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquir...less-for-games
#7
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hans
Originally Posted by nagel79
it'* not that bad, I've put on hundreds of 775 heat sinks
#8
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hans
too bad that most apps/games cant fully take advantage of multiple CPU threads.
For the average user, you are generally better off for home/gaming use in getting the fastest dual core processor with the most cache rather than a quad core at this point.
Why not to get a quad core processor:
in a business/application enviroment....
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.c...253467,00.html
for gaming...
http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquir...less-for-games
For the average user, you are generally better off for home/gaming use in getting the fastest dual core processor with the most cache rather than a quad core at this point.
Why not to get a quad core processor:
in a business/application enviroment....
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.c...253467,00.html
for gaming...
http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquir...less-for-games
#9
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Originally Posted by nagel79
I got it for the simple fact that I only had to pay $250 for the board, processor and vista