? for 1992 SSEi owners
thanks
04-08-2006, 01:41 PM
#3
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Farmington, Minnesota =MWBF '05 SURVIVOR= =CEBF '06 SURVIVOR= =August '06 COTM=
Posts: 9,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only reason a supercharged bonne would not have a hud would be if the car was ordered with the hud option deleted or a SE, SLE, or an SSE trim package special ordered with the Supercharger. I'm not positive how many of those options of the trim level that you could actually special order with the */C and not get all the gadgets.
04-08-2006, 02:29 PM
#6
I just sold my 92. The pics should show you everything you need to know:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMESE%3AIT
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMESE%3AIT
04-08-2006, 02:33 PM
#7
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Originally Posted by LakevilleSSEi
The only reason a supercharged bonne would not have a hud would be if the car was ordered with the hud option deleted or a SE, SLE, or an SSE trim package special ordered with the Supercharger. I'm not positive how many of those options of the trim level that you could actually special order with the */C and not get all the gadgets.
04-08-2006, 02:37 PM
#8
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Bend, IN (hometown) Indianapolis,IN (college)
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by willwren
92 has a wood-grained dashboard overlay. Slightly less power than a 93.
All the bells and whistles offered later.
All the bells and whistles offered later.
04-08-2006, 02:40 PM
#9
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Incorrectamundo.
I just sent this to Hans via PM when he asked the same question:
I just sent this to Hans via PM when he asked the same question:
From: willwren
To: Hans
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:49 am
Subject: Re: 92 vs 93
Unknown how much. GM never changed the ratings in 93, so we go by 92'* numbers.
92 had different heads and a non-roller valvetrain. Also had a different harmonic balancer, lighter drive axles (not heavy duty), some differences in transmission, and a few other odds and ends I don't recall. Oh, different Exhaust Manifolds........different pistons and rings......
The list goes on.
jr's3800 and I have been trying to chase this down for 3 years. We've got quite a few things identified. But the bottom line is that I shouldn't have beaten driverjohn by WELL OVER a full second at Woodburn 2 years ago, considering the fact that I had a transmission going south and he didn't. Our mod differences would dictate a 1/2 second ET difference. Not over a full second.
Most 92'* here seem to have less power than the 93'*.
To: Hans
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:49 am
Subject: Re: 92 vs 93
Unknown how much. GM never changed the ratings in 93, so we go by 92'* numbers.
92 had different heads and a non-roller valvetrain. Also had a different harmonic balancer, lighter drive axles (not heavy duty), some differences in transmission, and a few other odds and ends I don't recall. Oh, different Exhaust Manifolds........different pistons and rings......
The list goes on.
jr's3800 and I have been trying to chase this down for 3 years. We've got quite a few things identified. But the bottom line is that I shouldn't have beaten driverjohn by WELL OVER a full second at Woodburn 2 years ago, considering the fact that I had a transmission going south and he didn't. Our mod differences would dictate a 1/2 second ET difference. Not over a full second.
Most 92'* here seem to have less power than the 93'*.
04-08-2006, 03:43 PM
#10
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Berkeley, IL
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vital49
I just sold my 92. The pics should show you everything you need to know:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMESE%3AIT
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMESE%3AIT
