GM Forum - Buick, Cadillac, Olds, GMC & Pontiac chat

GM Forum - Buick, Cadillac, Olds, GMC & Pontiac chat (https://www.gmforum.com/)
-   General GM Chat (https://www.gmforum.com/general-gm-chat-88/)
-   -   Stock Series 1 L67 octane test results (https://www.gmforum.com/general-gm-chat-88/stock-series-1-l67-octane-test-results-241627/)

willwren 08-23-2006 12:56 PM

Stock Series 1 L67 octane test results
 
I recently made another round-trip to CA, and decided to use the trip as an octane test with the 95 SLE (supercharged).

The trip down was done at night on 89 octane mid-grade, in ambient temps from mid-60's to low-70's, ideal conditions for timing advance.

The trip back was done with 91 octane premium (California eco-blend, which is known to be inferior to the Oregon blend). The return trip was done during the day in ambient temps around the mid-90's.

Both 500+ mile legs are through major mountain passes with 6% grades.

The return trip with 91 octane netted me 5mpg better than the trip down in the cooler temps running 89 octane non-eco blend fuel.

In other words, the money saved by running 89 octane actually cost me, rather than saved. The cooler temps were not enough to overcome the timing loss due to octane.

1993 SLE 08-23-2006 01:05 PM

good info....FINALLY some good data why NOT to use the low grade fuels in the SC models

petraman 08-23-2006 01:06 PM

I never have, I've always put 92 in mine. Did you experience any knocking?

willwren 08-23-2006 01:07 PM

It surprised me. I figured the lower ambient temps (which increase timing) would be enough to offset the lower octane.

mrbell83 08-23-2006 01:53 PM


Originally Posted by willwren
It surprised me. I figured the lower ambient temps (which increase timing) would be enough to offset the lower octane.

So for a L27 like myself what should I run? I have no problem paying for premium.......If I need to.

bonnie94ssei 08-23-2006 02:26 PM


Originally Posted by mrbell83

Originally Posted by willwren
It surprised me. I figured the lower ambient temps (which increase timing) would be enough to offset the lower octane.

So for a L27 like myself what should I run? I have no problem paying for premium.......If I need to.

You don't need premium. You'd be fine with 87. I used 89 on my L27 though and was fine. I never got the best gas mileage with it though. Supercharged cars need premium. I believe most/all aftermarket performance chips require premiuim gas, so if you are NA and had a chip you would then require premium.

mrbell83 08-23-2006 02:34 PM


Originally Posted by bonnie94ssei

Originally Posted by mrbell83

Originally Posted by willwren
It surprised me. I figured the lower ambient temps (which increase timing) would be enough to offset the lower octane.

So for a L27 like myself what should I run? I have no problem paying for premium.......If I need to.

You don't need premium. You'd be fine with 87. I used 89 on my L27 though and was fine. I never got the best gas mileage with it though. Supercharged cars need premium. I believe most/all aftermarket performance chips require premiuim gas, so if you are NA and had a chip you would then require premium.

Well I always ask becasue i had a 1999 Blazer with a 4.3 V6 in it and it got just as bad of mileage on either grade, but it ran soooo much better with premium. Performance and idle wise.

BonneMeMN 08-23-2006 03:40 PM


Originally Posted by mrbell83

Well I always ask becasue i had a 1999 Blazer with a 4.3 V6 in it and it got just as bad of mileage on either grade, but it ran soooo much better with premium. Performance and idle wise.

Might be a placebo effect.

But how much would octane differences effect at cruising? The car isn't using full timing, or boost when you're chugging down the freeway @ 2,000 RPM. Obviously it's necessary for full power at WOT.

willwren 08-23-2006 08:16 PM

Jason, for me it makes a big difference. I live in the Willamette Valley in Oregon. Going anywhere? You're dealing with mountains. And alot of them.

ga93sle 08-23-2006 08:38 PM


Originally Posted by mrbell83

Originally Posted by bonnie94ssei

Originally Posted by mrbell83

Originally Posted by willwren
It surprised me. I figured the lower ambient temps (which increase timing) would be enough to offset the lower octane.

So for a L27 like myself what should I run? I have no problem paying for premium.......If I need to.

You don't need premium. You'd be fine with 87. I used 89 on my L27 though and was fine. I never got the best gas mileage with it though. Supercharged cars need premium. I believe most/all aftermarket performance chips require premiuim gas, so if you are NA and had a chip you would then require premium.

Well I always ask becasue i had a 1999 Blazer with a 4.3 V6 in it and it got just as bad of mileage on either grade, but it ran soooo much better with premium. Performance and idle wise.

If memory serves correctly, the L27 was designed to run 87. That's all that's ever been in my car, and it runs just fine.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands