S/C Replacment
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 12
Originally Posted by driverjohn2005
I won't reply 3 times 
It was 16.6 at 84mph
It was 16.6 at 84mph
John, give yourself credit.
jgs, the track was over 100°, and we were running street trim, too much gas, and no ice for the blowers. He'* at least .5 seconds quicker.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,099
Likes: 0
From: Bonney Lake/Ellensburg, Washington- WCBF '04, '05, '06, '07 Survivor-
Originally Posted by willwren
Originally Posted by driverjohn2005
I won't reply 3 times
It was 16.6 at 84mph
It was 16.6 at 84mph
John, give yourself credit.
jgs, the track was over 100°, and we were running street trim, too much gas, and no ice for the blowers. He'* at least .5 seconds quicker.
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,928
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by willwren
Originally Posted by driverjohn2005
I won't reply 3 times
It was 16.6 at 84mph
It was 16.6 at 84mph
jgs, the track was over 100°, and we were running street trim, too much gas, and no ice for the blowers. He'* at least .5 seconds quicker.
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 2
From: Purgatory
Originally Posted by willwren
That'* probably about right, as we figured 3 of us were running about .3-.5 slower than expected. Mostly due to the extreme heat conditions, and partially to our full street weight.
that best describes the conditions
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Salina, KS
Originally Posted by PontiacDad
Originally Posted by willwren
That'* probably about right, as we figured 3 of us were running about .3-.5 slower than expected. Mostly due to the extreme heat conditions, and partially to our full street weight.
that best describes the conditions