2000-2005 Discuss your 2000-2005 Bonneville SE, SLE, and SSEi Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Fuel sending unit problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2006, 08:56 AM
  #1  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
 
Toms94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toms94 is on a distinguished road
Default Fuel sending unit problem

Does anyone here know if there is a problem with the fuel sending unit getting sulfer corrosion and makes it stop working? I know that the C5 Corvettes have an issue and apparrently 1999 and up GM light trucks have the same issue. Now I am wondering if this is a future problem with the Bonneville.
Old 03-10-2006, 09:13 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
PontiacDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PontiacDad is on a distinguished road
Default

The only fuel gauge problems we've had so far were a bad ground wire in 2k+ bonne'*.
There was a warning a while back about using Shell gas as it contains too much sulfur for our gm fuel injectors?
Old 03-10-2006, 09:13 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
lash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 7,030
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
lash is on a distinguished road
Default

Not really sure what is the exact cause, but we do know that the fuel sender is known to fail on our cars. I know for sure that it is a '96-99 issue and have no reason to believe that other years are any better.
Old 03-10-2006, 10:35 AM
  #4  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
 
Toms94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toms94 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by lash
Not really sure what is the exact cause, but we do know that the fuel sender is known to fail on our cars. I know for sure that it is a '96-99 issue and have no reason to believe that other years are any better.


My guess is that this is the same issue that the other GM products have. According to a GM tech, GM has come out with a Fuel system additive. Here is the info I found:

GM Fuel System Treatment PLUS, Fuel Sending Unit Corrosion and Fuel System Deposits #05-00-89-078 - (Nov 9, 2005)

2006 and Prior All GM Cars and Trucks

2003-2006 HUMMER H2

2006 HUMMER H3

2006 and Prior Saturn (Canada Only)

2005-2006 Saab 9-7X

GM Fuel System Treatment PLUS
GM Fuel System Treatment PLUS, P/N 88861011 (for U.*. ACDelco®, use 88861013) (in Canada, 88861012), is now available.

Added Benefits and Uses
The PLUS portion of GM Fuel System Treatment PLUS is the addition of a filmer additive that, when used regularly, can protect fuel system sending units from the corrosive effects of certain sulfur contaminants found in some of today'* gasoline.

Sulfur contamination can disrupt electrical continuity of certain fuel sending units and lead to erratic or false fuel gauge readings. With scheduled usage, GM Fuel System Treatment PLUS protects against the effects of harmful sulfurs in gasoline.

You Get Four Benefits
One bottle of GM Fuel System Treatment PLUS added to the fuel tank at each oil change:

• Cleans -- Sulfur corrosion from fuel gauge sending units.

• Prevents -- Harmful sulfur components from attacking sensitive fuel system electronics.

• Protects -- By coating metallic surfaces of the fuel system.

• Removes -- Engine deposits left from use of poor quality fuels.

GM Fuel System Treatment PLUS will replace the original GM Fuel System Treatment, P/N 12345104 (in Canada, 89020804). The original formula may still be available for a limited time, and provides the excellent Fuel System Cleaning aspects of the new product without the filmer.
[/quote]
Old 03-10-2006, 12:31 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
lash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 7,030
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
lash is on a distinguished road
Default

Hmmmm....interesting. So let me guess, it'* only available through your friendly neighbohood GM dealer, right?
Old 03-10-2006, 12:34 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
vital49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
vital49 is on a distinguished road
Default

For what it'* worth, the sender failed on my 99. We dealt with it for about a year (using the trip odometer). I ended up swapping out the faulty unit for a new GM one. It'* a pricy SOB....$330.
Old 03-10-2006, 01:10 PM
  #7  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
 
Toms94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toms94 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by lash
Hmmmm....interesting. So let me guess, it'* only available through your friendly neighbohood GM dealer, right?
It appears to be so! My question is; Why don't they just fix the problem instead of bandaiding it? They know it'* an issue with millions of cars and trucks, seems they should stand behind them and fix them, maybe not for free but at least a a reduced price.
Old 03-10-2006, 01:19 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
lash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 7,030
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
lash is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Toms94
Originally Posted by lash
Hmmmm....interesting. So let me guess, it'* only available through your friendly neighbohood GM dealer, right?
It appears to be so! My question is; Why don't they just fix the problem instead of bandaiding it? They know it'* an issue with millions of cars and trucks, seems they should stand behind them and fix them, maybe not for free but at least a a reduced price.
I get the impression that GM feels the issue is quality variation in the fuel supply, not their sender unit. I just re-read the notice and see there'* an AC Delco P/N...hmmmmm.
Old 03-10-2006, 04:39 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
markwb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Groton, CT _NEBF 05, 06, 07_
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
markwb is on a distinguished road
Default

I would factor in planned obsolescence. They (GM & others) want stuff to wear out prematurely.
Old 03-10-2006, 04:45 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
Sully1742's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sully1742 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by vital49
For what it'* worth, the sender failed on my 99. We dealt with it for about a year (using the trip odometer). I ended up swapping out the faulty unit for a new GM one. It'* a pricy SOB....$330.
Mine failed on my 97, and is still. My mechanic wanted 400 bucks after alls said and done to fix it. I'll stick to my trip odometer.


Quick Reply: Fuel sending unit problem



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.