Keep in mind this is the original one. I flipped by the volts reading on the aeroforce gauge and it says


Monday while Marty was with it said 12.x while driving.

That certainly does not look normal. Running it should be in the 14.5 V range.

I would suspect the alternator needs to be replaced. How is your battery :?:

Maybe it doesn't look normal for a 2000, it'* right on mark with the readings from my 1997. The charging system and type of alternator used is different between 97 and 00+. I've changed batteries, alternators and battery cables previously.

Went at it with alternators to ensure it wasn't related to them. It'* not.. my car like 13-13.7V at the most. I've looked into the voltage booster..and they don't appear to apply to the setup on the 97'*.

Battery is fairly new. Never have a problem starting, or any other electrical quirks.

While your gauge reads that pathetic 13.x go hit the battery with a multimeter at the same time.

Mine read 14 or close enough that I figured the parameter the Aeroforce reads isn't quite what is expected.

on my 00, the Aeroforce and the DIC show at least 14.5

On the 92-99 iv seen it rang (depending on if the car is fully warmed up) from 13'* to 14'*

whit my aeroforce stock reading where between 13.8 and 14,1 now since i got the diode on i get between 14.2 and 14.9 but mostly it at 14.5 volts but that on a 98 3 wires alt i think its differend from yours

Right Don.. we have the two wire setup.

The higher the voltage the better IMO. Take your fuel pump for instance. More voltage will increase flow. I suppose if it'* designed for a lower voltage that might be alright.