GM Forum - Buick, Cadillac, Olds, GMC & Pontiac chat

GM Forum - Buick, Cadillac, Olds, GMC & Pontiac chat (https://www.gmforum.com/)
-   1992-1999 (https://www.gmforum.com/1992-1999-91/)
-   -   Failled Upper? Sound off: (https://www.gmforum.com/1992-1999-91/failled-upper-sound-off-210758/)

mkaake 12-23-2004 10:45 AM

Failled Upper? Sound off:
 
Okay, I was wondering if those of you with failed uppers can quickly let me know if it was a rochester or delphi unit, and the year of your car...

matt

MOS95B 12-23-2004 10:52 AM

Mine just failed last month (assuming for the second time since it was marked 2001). This time I got the newly redesigned (not series 3, tho) Upper and Lower intakes. Cost me a penny or two extra for the work.

vital49 12-23-2004 11:06 AM

My upper was a Delphi, but it hadn't failed. I bought a new intake (thinking that my old one was melted as I was doing the project as preventative maintenance). When I unbolted it, to my surprise, it looked like new. Regardless, I still bolted on the new on that I bought. It, too, is a Delphi.

The lower gaskets on the other hand.... :shock: :roll:

SSEBONNE4EVA 12-23-2004 11:43 AM

delphi
 
My original was a rochester and had signs of burning but no failure.
Installed a Delphi.

mkaake 12-23-2004 05:46 PM

i also have a rochester that hasn't failed. my lowers were shot though.

Ranger 12-23-2004 08:52 PM


Originally Posted by vital49
My upper was a Delphi, but it hadn't failed. I bought a new intake (thinking that my old one was melted as I was doing the project as preventative maintenance). When I unbolted it, to my surprise, it looked like new. Regardless, I still bolted on the new on that I bought. It, too, is a Delphi.

The lower gaskets on the other hand.... :shock: :roll:

Ditto. Turned out all I needed was a TB gasket.

mkaake 12-24-2004 10:42 AM


Originally Posted by opensourceguy
Buring your intakes? What the H*** are you guys running? Like 3,000* engine temps? Sounds like you guys need a better cooling system.

Oh wait, your intakes are made of plastic.. hahaha! Losers.

/A$$****

-justin

uh, right.

anyway, on topic...

BonneMeMN 12-24-2004 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by opensourceguy
Buring your intakes? What the H*** are you guys running? Like 3,000* engine temps? Sounds like you guys need a better cooling system.

Oh wait, your intakes are made of plastic.. hahaha! Losers.

/A$$****

-justin

The LS7 has a composite manifold as well. It's lighter, easier to build complex tunels with, and cheaper. The only reason they fail in L36's is because of the EGR stove-pipe touching them. An L27 composite intake flows better then the original 3800 one as well. :wink:

mkaake 12-24-2004 03:31 PM


Originally Posted by BonneMeMN

Originally Posted by opensourceguy
Buring your intakes? What the H*** are you guys running? Like 3,000* engine temps? Sounds like you guys need a better cooling system.

Oh wait, your intakes are made of plastic.. hahaha! Losers.

/A$$****

-justin

The LS7 has a composite manifold as well. It's lighter, easier to build complex tunels with, and cheaper. The only reason they fail in L36's is because of the EGR stove-pipe touching them. An L27 composite intake flows better then the original 3800 one as well. :wink:

bingo.

composite intakes are great (they're used on the ls1, 2, 4, and 6, btw), and they're usually nothing but benefits. but someone goofed up a little with their thermodynamics, and we're paying the price for it. so it goes.

GAMEOVER 12-24-2004 03:34 PM


Originally Posted by opensourceguy
Buring your intakes? What the H*** are you guys running? Like 3,000* engine temps? Sounds like you guys need a better cooling system.

Oh wait, your intakes are made of plastic.. hahaha! Losers.

/A$$****

-justin

get with the program since your a northstar


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands