1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

1994 pontiac bonnie non supercharged tranny

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 11:13 AM
  #1  
MeticulousMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: albany,ny
MeticulousMike is on a distinguished road
Default 1994 pontiac bonnie non supercharged tranny

would it hurt to put in a fw17 instead of a fw2 option ratio?thank you.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 05:26 PM
  #2  
Mike's Avatar
Retired
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,960
Likes: 1,839
From: Dark Side, AZ
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

FW17 isn't an RPO. Is this a typo?

FW2 is 3.06
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 06:54 PM
  #3  
MeticulousMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: albany,ny
MeticulousMike is on a distinguished road
Default

oh it must be a typo yeah the other ratio 2.83 whatever.you know what I mean.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 07:05 PM
  #4  
Mike's Avatar
Retired
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,960
Likes: 1,839
From: Dark Side, AZ
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

2.83 would get you better fuel mileage, but you lose your get up and go like you get with the 3.06.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 09:57 AM
  #5  
MeticulousMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: albany,ny
MeticulousMike is on a distinguished road
Default

thanks for the reply...now being said if i were to get the other tranny would it set off any codes or have drivability problems?.if it does have a code issue wouldn't it be good to get the computer that was in the car i get the tranny from?. so i have a match on tranny and pcm.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 04:56 PM
  #6  
Mike's Avatar
Retired
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,960
Likes: 1,839
From: Dark Side, AZ
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Yes, if the PCM doesn't know about the different trans, it may throw a code about improper gear ratio. So yes, it would be better to grab the matching PCM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iceman1
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
12
May 14, 2014 07:00 AM
Mr Fix It
1992-1999
7
Feb 8, 2010 06:50 PM
rel3rd
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
16
Jun 24, 2005 11:01 PM
Hans
General GM Chat
22
May 6, 2005 09:36 PM
big_boss2010
1992-1999
4
Sep 6, 2003 02:24 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.