Series I performance parts - **Updated Page 1**
#171
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jachin
Would it be a good idea to replace because you already have it apart and your car has over 100k on it?
There'* always going to be something you 'should' or 'better' replace 'while I'm in here'. Of course I'm going to say yes, surely you should replace most of whats in there at over 100k mi. You "should" replace your lifters, retainers, valve locks, timing chain and tensioner, and maybe your cam and crank sensor 'since you already have it apart.' Although most of that I wouldn't put on the top of my list.
Sorry for the extensive use of quotes, just worked out that way
Seriously, to answer the question (the best I can). Obviously since you're modding it you plan on keeping it for a while. At some point in the engines life you're going to need to replace it (project creep?) so...sure, if you can easily afford it now or really don't want to do it later. Then again some would say 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it.'
#172
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
those lucky bastards in australia can probly install those rockers in like 20 minutes with both valve covers having easy access, im on the 3rd hour trying to take off my rear valve cover!!! ::vent over:: now I feel much better!
#173
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, it took me like an hour to do it all and I was taking my time. The rear cover isn't too bad, unhook your power steering reservoir from its base and just shove it out of the way, don't even need to disconnect the hose. Just pull up on the back end and slide it down, should unhook. Might benefit from disconnecting your fuel lines, although I didn't need to. After that it should be pretty easy, just takes a little work to get the cover off after you've unbolted it.
Good luck!
Good luck!
#174
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm pulling mine , but I've got other things going on at the same time..
First off the springs...wow...$60 for the whole set. Nearly 50% off comparable sets. That aside...
This is a long post, but there'* plenty of info...
Ok, found out some info on the cams and I really want to open this up for discussion. The lifts shown are at stock 1.6 so its a what you see is what you get deal, other than those with 1.72 rockers.
So I looked further to see where the performance came from and believe its the duration and valve timing. I did some research and rapped all the info into Dyno2003 which many people stand by its accuracy. The only issue I'm having is with a few numbers for the supercharger input so don't take this as a "what you'll get" but more of a comparison from one cam to another using an identical base. Here'* what I've come up with:
Intense Stage 3 blower cam:
Base:
Cylinder heads: Wedge/Stock ports and valves
Intake Valve DIA: 1.710
Exhaust Valve DIA: 1.490
CR: 8.5:1
Induciton flow: 460cfm @ 1.50 inHg
Roots blower 2.2" pulley
Island flow: 60cfm
Peak Efficiency: 50%
Boost limit: 10.4psi
Belt ratio: 3.13
Camshaft:
Intake lift @ valve: .541" (Using stock 1.6 ratio)
Exhaust lift @ valve: .554" (Using stock 1.6 ratio)
Lifter Acceleration Rate: 3.20
#'* at 0.050" lift
Intake valve open: 0.0*
Intake valve closed: 42*
Exhaust valve open: 53*
Exhaust valve closed: -5*
Valve Overlap: -5.0*
Intake Duration: 222*
Exhaust Duration: 228*
Results: 253hp@5000rpm 300#@3500rpm
-----------------------
'63 Cam:
Base: Same as above
Camshaft:
Intake lift @ valve: .472" (Using stock 1.6 ratio)
Exhaust lift @ valve: .472 (Using stock 1.6 ratio)
Lifter Acceleration Rate: 3.20
#'* at Seat to Seat
Intake valve open: 25.0*
Intake valve closed: 65*
Exhaust valve open: 72*
Exhaust valve closed: 24*
Valve Overlap: 49*
Intake Duration: 270*
Exhaust Duration: 276*
Results: 275hp@5500rpm 299#@4000rpm
-------------------------
Again, this isn't to show you how much power you'll get because surely some of the supercharger #'* are off (Not much info on the m62 out there!). But I wanted to give a visual example of how duration, overlap, and valve timing can make up for lifts short commings.
So...whats the group thoughts? Good cams or should we look elsewhere?
First off the springs...wow...$60 for the whole set. Nearly 50% off comparable sets. That aside...
This is a long post, but there'* plenty of info...
Ok, found out some info on the cams and I really want to open this up for discussion. The lifts shown are at stock 1.6 so its a what you see is what you get deal, other than those with 1.72 rockers.
So I looked further to see where the performance came from and believe its the duration and valve timing. I did some research and rapped all the info into Dyno2003 which many people stand by its accuracy. The only issue I'm having is with a few numbers for the supercharger input so don't take this as a "what you'll get" but more of a comparison from one cam to another using an identical base. Here'* what I've come up with:
Intense Stage 3 blower cam:
Base:
Cylinder heads: Wedge/Stock ports and valves
Intake Valve DIA: 1.710
Exhaust Valve DIA: 1.490
CR: 8.5:1
Induciton flow: 460cfm @ 1.50 inHg
Roots blower 2.2" pulley
Island flow: 60cfm
Peak Efficiency: 50%
Boost limit: 10.4psi
Belt ratio: 3.13
Camshaft:
Intake lift @ valve: .541" (Using stock 1.6 ratio)
Exhaust lift @ valve: .554" (Using stock 1.6 ratio)
Lifter Acceleration Rate: 3.20
#'* at 0.050" lift
Intake valve open: 0.0*
Intake valve closed: 42*
Exhaust valve open: 53*
Exhaust valve closed: -5*
Valve Overlap: -5.0*
Intake Duration: 222*
Exhaust Duration: 228*
Results: 253hp@5000rpm 300#@3500rpm
-----------------------
'63 Cam:
Base: Same as above
Camshaft:
Intake lift @ valve: .472" (Using stock 1.6 ratio)
Exhaust lift @ valve: .472 (Using stock 1.6 ratio)
Lifter Acceleration Rate: 3.20
#'* at Seat to Seat
Intake valve open: 25.0*
Intake valve closed: 65*
Exhaust valve open: 72*
Exhaust valve closed: 24*
Valve Overlap: 49*
Intake Duration: 270*
Exhaust Duration: 276*
Results: 275hp@5500rpm 299#@4000rpm
-------------------------
Again, this isn't to show you how much power you'll get because surely some of the supercharger #'* are off (Not much info on the m62 out there!). But I wanted to give a visual example of how duration, overlap, and valve timing can make up for lifts short commings.
So...whats the group thoughts? Good cams or should we look elsewhere?
#175
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Good cam, im in. Like i said ill be gone from tomorow morning until friday night, ill think about the springs between now and then, depending on how much money i have when i get back.
#177
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Springs..
Originally Posted by jachin
Good cam, im in. Like i said ill be gone from tomorow morning until friday night, ill think about the springs between now and then, depending on how much money i have when i get back.
Originally Posted by salmanman
DJ.........
Put me down for the Springs......
Just let me know when you need to send the $$$$
Sal
Put me down for the Springs......
Just let me know when you need to send the $$$$
Sal
#178
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Ok it looks like ill just be getting the cam for now, ill get springs with rockers. Those numbers are with the cam a 2.2 pulley and an exhaust and air intake right? so with rockers ill be getting somewhere in the neighborhood of 290 correct. Would hotter coils help me out any after all of this and maybe an msd ignition box?
#179
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jachin
Ok it looks like ill just be getting the cam for now, ill get springs with rockers.
Sounds good, but I can't guarantee the price whenever that is.
Those numbers are with the cam a 2.2 pulley and an exhaust and air intake right?
Yeah, but don't count on their accuracy. I saw earlier today they used the exact same program as they were building an engine. Engine came out ~3hp over the estimate. Not bad. But I'm not 100% confident on some of the setup numbers of the supercharger
so with rockers ill be getting somewhere in the neighborhood of 290 correct.
Its difficult to say, and it depends a lot on supporting mods.
Would hotter coils help me out any after all of this and maybe an msd ignition box?
I'm not a huge fan of upgraded coils, I got mine as more of a replacement. An MSD box is always a nice upgrade though.
Sounds good, but I can't guarantee the price whenever that is.
Those numbers are with the cam a 2.2 pulley and an exhaust and air intake right?
Yeah, but don't count on their accuracy. I saw earlier today they used the exact same program as they were building an engine. Engine came out ~3hp over the estimate. Not bad. But I'm not 100% confident on some of the setup numbers of the supercharger
so with rockers ill be getting somewhere in the neighborhood of 290 correct.
Its difficult to say, and it depends a lot on supporting mods.
Would hotter coils help me out any after all of this and maybe an msd ignition box?
I'm not a huge fan of upgraded coils, I got mine as more of a replacement. An MSD box is always a nice upgrade though.