New true CAI for 2000+ Bonnevilles
11-15-2005, 11:50 PM
#11
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1993 SLE
00indySSEI was the test car for thrasher
11-16-2005, 08:02 PM
#12
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Posts: 5,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Puddy46
Would it work on the 92+'*?
For proper fitment on a 1992-1995 you will need to use a 1996-1999 windshield washer fluid tank, and on 96-99'* you will need a PCM tray to mount the PCM in as the PCM * right where the box wants to go.
11-19-2005, 02:40 PM
#15
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bolingbrook, IL Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BUMP for L27Buick and me...
I have a Thrasher CAI for a GP in my 95 SLE SC.
For proper fitment on a 1992-1995 you will need to use a 1996-1999 windshield washer fluid tank, and on 96-99'* you will need a PCM tray to mount the PCM in as the PCM * right where the box wants to go.
yeah what he said.
Originally Posted by OLBlueEyesBonne
Originally Posted by Puddy46
Would it work on the 92+'*?
For proper fitment on a 1992-1995 you will need to use a 1996-1999 windshield washer fluid tank, and on 96-99'* you will need a PCM tray to mount the PCM in as the PCM * right where the box wants to go.
Originally Posted by llBlazin_llLo
Any pics of that?
Originally Posted by L27Buick
Originally Posted by llBlazin_llLo
Any pics of that?
11-19-2005, 06:59 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Rogue
Originally Posted by Mark Fahey
That appears to be a very nice setup with the possible exception that the tubing is the same accordian style as stock. By virtue of not having the downturn that a FWI uses, I would think it would be less restrictive than a FWI(no flaming please). However, rather than stating that it "should be good for 10-15 hp", they should do a comparison on a dyno where the only variable is the intake. That way, they can make a fact based claim.