MAF Mod followup
#22
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 6,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It got new plugs and wires three days ago, The old ones had this light brown coating all over them and were gapped too wide. New AC-Delco plugs @ 0.60 installed.
The Fuel pressure went from 38 at idle to 42 when i removed the vacuum line from it.
The latest scan is uploaded www.damemorder.com/scan/
The Fuel pressure went from 38 at idle to 42 when i removed the vacuum line from it.
The latest scan is uploaded www.damemorder.com/scan/
#24
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 6,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was thinking that too... But the MAF'* aren't what I can get with it sitting still, The headlight must be in the way, I need a CAI box and ram air....
#26
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Damemorder
That coolant leak came back again. Can I pull my UIM and tap and plug the holes in the LIM like the SC cars do?
take your time and get that UIM fixed first. No need getting coolant in your oil becuase you rushed it.
Would your friend mind getting the new TB on his car?
#27
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Secondary thoughts:
On this run the IAT was picking up really hot air, which should negatively affect the MAF reading (hence power) BUT the reading this time was actually ~800gr/sec HIGHER at its peak reading.
Averaging out your spark advance at WOT your old reading was 20.2 while this one was 21.7, and much smoother and consistent. Could just be the pump is acting right for a second though...
Your coolant temp was considerably colder also...
On this run the IAT was picking up really hot air, which should negatively affect the MAF reading (hence power) BUT the reading this time was actually ~800gr/sec HIGHER at its peak reading.
Averaging out your spark advance at WOT your old reading was 20.2 while this one was 21.7, and much smoother and consistent. Could just be the pump is acting right for a second though...
Your coolant temp was considerably colder also...
#28
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 6,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, Trav is at work... That and He'* not into R&D at all, he just got the car
My UIM only lost a little peice, Making it leak coolant... if there was no coolant there to leak, Problem solved. And I mean tapping a plugging the holes on the LIM side, it'* solid aluminum.
My UIM only lost a little peice, Making it leak coolant... if there was no coolant there to leak, Problem solved. And I mean tapping a plugging the holes on the LIM side, it'* solid aluminum.
#29
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 6,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DrJay
Your coolant temp was considerably colder also...
#30
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm...the little bit before the WOT run shows a bit of a rich condition, but I doubt so much that its running colder. It ran for ~30min and still didn't warm up? hrm