Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

question about porting

Old 04-30-2008, 05:58 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Thread Starter
 
phoenix_flame220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
phoenix_flame220 is on a distinguished road
Default question about porting

I have 94 heads and intakes on my Vin C. I gasket matched the LIM to the heads. They transition smoothly into eachother and I did not alter the top of the LIM there there injector sprays in. I read a post somewhere i forget, but they said not to gasket match the ports. Am I going to get any nasty surprises when I get it all back together?
Old 04-30-2008, 06:14 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
samueljackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: burb of detroit. 2 miles north of 8 mile Rd.
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
samueljackson is on a distinguished road
Default

if you gasket matched to port, then you overported. you have now created turbulance from the LIM ports being larger than the head ports.
Old 04-30-2008, 06:18 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
95naSTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
95naSTA is on a distinguished road
Default

So you opened up the LIM and heads to the gasket?

One reason you wouldn't want to open them up that far is if the cross sectional area of the LIM exit is larger than it'* inlet. That will slow the air down since the cross section goes small big and then small at the coke point in the head.
I couldn't tell you if that LIM keeps the same cross sectional area but I know the L36 LIM decreases about 30% to ramp up velocity. I would expect something similar on an n/a engine.
There'* also the possibility of opening it up too much and loosing velocity.. But your not going to know if that will be the case for sure until you try it out.
Old 04-30-2008, 06:20 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Thread Starter
 
phoenix_flame220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
phoenix_flame220 is on a distinguished road
Default

I test fitted it and the transition between the LIM and the heads is barely noticeable. Will this still cause turbulence?

edit: I didnt have to open the heads up that much, I tried to keep the LIM runners and the intake of the head as flat as possible. The series 1 runners have a much more gradual slope leading into the head. I hope I didnt over do it. But it cant be any worse than what was in there could it?
Old 04-30-2008, 06:24 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
samueljackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: burb of detroit. 2 miles north of 8 mile Rd.
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
samueljackson is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by phoenix_flame220
I test fitted it and the transition between the LIM and the heads is barely noticeable. Will this still cause turbulence?
yes. but the question is how much? i dont know

but if just the rough casting causes turbulance, than think of how that overporting will affect it.
Old 04-30-2008, 06:26 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
samueljackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: burb of detroit. 2 miles north of 8 mile Rd.
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
samueljackson is on a distinguished road
Default

if you opened the heads too, then you have a better chance of reducing the turbulance of overporting.

did you measure with a micrometer? or just gaskets?
Old 04-30-2008, 06:31 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Thread Starter
 
phoenix_flame220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
phoenix_flame220 is on a distinguished road
Default

I just went to the gaskets, but I made sure that the gaskets were a little recessed so they didnt affect the flow. The only place it isnt smooth is there the injector is. Theres a bit of a step down into the head because I didnt want to screw up the injector tuning. I blended in the exit of the runners about 1.5 inches to make sure there were no bumps or divets. I think itll be ok, but I got a little concerned when I read that comment.
Old 04-30-2008, 11:01 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

If you ported the heads with your mods (none), you lost port velocity. That'* the simplest view. You shouldn't have ported the heads at all. No benefit, and a couple negatives.
Old 05-01-2008, 12:41 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
wjcollier07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wjcollier07 is on a distinguished road
Default

What necessary additional mods are available to make the porting worthwhile? Otherwise how would he make what he has already done, useful, instead of negatively affecting performance.
Old 05-01-2008, 07:59 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

CAI, high-flow cat, and 1.8 ratio rocker arms.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: question about porting



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.