Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

I know some of you are engineers....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2005, 02:19 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
Damemorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 6,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damemorder is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by 95naSTA
How high and how far back is the rear mount in relation to the cv?
It'* also going to be hard to use the transmission'* weight because you don't know where the center of gravity is.
.5" higher and 7" back from the CV.

The center of the tranny'* weight is about 2" back from the block mounting face and 15" from the front mount face. it'* nice to have chains and a hoist.
Old 06-21-2005, 03:11 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
95naSTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
95naSTA is on a distinguished road
Default

The more i think about this, the more i realize that you need finite element analysis to really tackle this. The only program i'm really familiar with is ANSYS (hp) and i can only access it at school. I know Bill is pretty good at another FE program. Maybe you can convince him to tackle it when he gets back from my home state?
Old 06-21-2005, 03:52 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
Damemorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 6,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damemorder is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by willwren
You obviously have to drill holes in the steel for the rubber/poly to flow into, but you also have to determine the load direction. I assume it'* perpendicular to the flat steel faces? If so, you don't have much of a mount. Alot depends on the flex of the material you use, but in reality, there'* a ton of leverage on the rubber material in that design.
I would assume the force would be upwards paralell to the upper face of the mount, with maybe a little bit to the right because the motor wants to go up and back.

Originally Posted by Damemorder
Okay, from the fulcrum point of the rear mount to the CV is 7 inches, from the CV to the front mount is 18 inches. If the CV has 500ft. lbs. applied to it, how much lifting force is applied to the front mount and at what angle? Also note that the mounting face of the front mount is one inch higher that the centerline of the CV and rear mount. I assume the wet weight of 375lbs for the drivetrain may apply.

the rear mount would see 857.53 lbs. of downward force,
The front mount would see 333.33 lbs. of upward force?

Originally Posted by 95naSTA
The more i think about this, the more i realize that you need finite element analysis to really tackle this. The only program i'm really familiar with is ANSYS (hp) and i can only access it at school. I know Bill is pretty good at another FE program. Maybe you can convince him to tackle it when he gets back from my home state?
Sure, Thanks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95naSTA
Lounge
12
01-02-2006 01:32 PM
2000SilverBullet
Lounge
7
07-20-2005 03:34 PM
Spiral
Lounge
13
01-05-2005 11:19 PM
BonneMeMN
Everything Electrical & Electronic
20
11-08-2004 03:38 PM
Old_School_Club
Lounge
9
06-07-2004 10:23 PM



Quick Reply: I know some of you are engineers....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.