Gut a 87-91 airbox?
03-28-2006, 03:36 PM
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also, have you ever heard of anyone running without an air filter? one of my friends does that, i keep telling him, that really is not a good idea....but he has run like that for like 2000 miles..he said he gets better performance...whacko
03-28-2006, 03:41 PM
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i am gonna laugh soo hard when the one day i don't see him driving, hes gonna tell me he killed his intake cause something big got in there...or it will be something stupid like he will get a leaf on the MAF sensor blocking it and he will stall..HAA that will be SOOO funny!!@@$#$@!
03-28-2006, 03:43 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
The 87-91 Box is really not restrictive... But the intake I stuck on mine sure did seem to help the low end torque, and just made the car more dirveable...LOL 
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
03-28-2006, 03:58 PM
#15
Senior Member
True Car Nut
There'* really no engine, NA or not that, can't benefit from better air throughput. That'* what the SC is all about, after all. Of course at some point you have to improve the rest of the throughput restrictions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
egladman
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
21
02-20-2008 03:10 AM