Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

GM 4.3 V6 conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2004, 11:50 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
big_news_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
big_news_1 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for all the response gentlemen... this has obviously been considered before. I never thought the 4.3 was a dog. Maybe there'* a difference between the Blazer/S10 motor and the High Output in the Astro van. Either way, you can't argue with the torque numbers. With a little TLC I bet you could really wake up one of those babies. Plus you'd have the deeper idle rumble than an L67 or smaller Northstar. As I said before this is strictly a thought experiment for me at this point in time. But I might come back to it later in life. We'll see...
Old 12-10-2004, 01:02 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
macho_mike21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
macho_mike21 is on a distinguished road
Default

my friend has the 4.3 in his S10 and it pulls very nicely. Maybe a little faster than my bonnie, we havnt had a chance to compare yet.
Old 12-10-2004, 10:43 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
BonneMeMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,928
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BonneMeMN is on a distinguished road
Default

THe problem with the 3.8 isn't displacement at all. It'* larger then A LOT of engines over seas. It just needs to make some real power. The head design is very conservative, and the cam is almost as flat as a ruler. It does drive likea truck motor, hard off the line, and flat torque curve, with a 5kish redline.

the 4.3 is even more of a "truck motor". You're really getting about the same performance, and just using more gas.
Old 12-10-2004, 11:06 AM
  #24  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Humboldt Sask. Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flatlander is on a distinguished road
Default

I have a 97 Sonoma with the H.O. 4.3 motor. Also have a 2000 4.3 H.O. to put into it when the original needs replacing. The problem with trying to install this in a bonneville is that the bell housing bolt pattern and layout is totally different that the 3.8 engines. There is no way you can bolt it up to the car transmission without a bunch of headache, and then motor mount issues on top of that. The 4.3 seems to last quite well as I have already 175000 miles on it and it still runs just like new but have been using Mobile 1 synthetic lube from new on also.

Flatlander
Old 12-10-2004, 11:15 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
1993 SLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

yea i agree to dependablity we have the 94 4.3 vin Z and it has 130,000+ and there has never been a problem with that engine.

*goes and knocks on wood*
Old 12-10-2004, 03:15 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
fantastic88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
fantastic88 is on a distinguished road
Default

Supposedly that Typhoon 4.3 turbo can go from 0-60mph in the 5 second catagory. Hmmm.. if I ever get an SUV I wonder what i'll get?
Old 12-10-2004, 04:55 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
llBlazin_llLo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bolingbrook, IL Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
llBlazin_llLo is on a distinguished road
Default

Why would you want to swap a 4.3 Vortec? If your going to go through all the headache of swapping a differend engine in why would you pick that engine? + I know quite a few people with *-10'* and Blazers that aree taking out there 4.3'* and putting in L67'* so I think that it is a fact that 3800'* have more potential then 4.3. By the way how sweet would a L67 with 4 wheel drive be?
Old 12-10-2004, 09:52 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
BonneMeMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,928
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BonneMeMN is on a distinguished road
Default

You're right about the Bellhousing being different. I think it'* the same as the LSx series of engines as well, since the LSx series was based off the 4.3 v6 early in it'* design.

So drop an Ls1 in there that revs (oh 7k?) and then you're set.

Also, the new 7.0L in the Z06 is based off the same small block. So you could prob fit one of those in there...
Old 12-11-2004, 12:13 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
macho_mike21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
macho_mike21 is on a distinguished road
Default

4.3 + M90...HOLY COW!
Old 12-11-2004, 12:14 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
1993 SLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by macho_mike21
4.3 + M90...HOLY COW!
what about a 4.3 + M112


Quick Reply: GM 4.3 V6 conversion



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.