Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

my opinion on CAI VS STOCK INTAKES

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2007, 12:56 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
Thread Starter
 
SSEi93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Castroville/Sacramento,CA,tampa,florida
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SSEi93 is on a distinguished road
Default my opinion on CAI VS STOCK INTAKES

i think that cold air intakes are not horsepower wise good for the series one engine because it robs horsepower and low end torque. i think that stock intakes are better.there stock tweecked for that engine already.aftermarket intakes for them engines are bad(SERIES ONE).thats my story and opinion,what about you guys,what do you guys think?
Old 11-02-2007, 01:05 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
McGrath's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wickliffe, Ohio
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default Re: my opinion on CAI VS STOCK INTAKES

Originally Posted by SSEi93
i think that cold air intakes are not horsepower wise good for the series one engine because it robs horsepower and low end torque.
How would a CAI on a S1 3800 differ from any other motor? A properly setup CAI is just that Cold Air Intake, it allows colder air to enter the motor with less restriction compared to the stock airbox. I can't see how a stock airbox would be the best for performance under any circumstance.

Ed
Old 11-02-2007, 03:25 AM
  #3  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
freneticburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
freneticburn is on a distinguished road
Default

I never really understood the significance of CAI or FWI. On my car I gutted the airbox and added a high flow air filter and all I noticed was a little better throttle response, other than that I cannot say I noticed any improvement. I don't think you ever see a significant increase in horsepower, let alone a decrease. That just doesn't make sense in my mind.
Old 11-02-2007, 04:31 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
theJMFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Jenison, MI (Near Grand Rapids)
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
theJMFC is on a distinguished road
Default

I fail to understand the reasoning here.

The stock box is, of course, designed for it'* application. That said, it is not ideal. I'm sure that if production costs weren't a factor, GM would have done better. Smoother air passages, less restriction, more filter area.

But even if an aftermarket CAI or FWI didn't make things noticeably better, I don't understand how they could make things worse (assuming that it is well designed)...?
Old 11-02-2007, 10:23 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
GoldenBullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GoldenBullet is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by theJMFC
But even if an aftermarket CAI or FWI didn't make things noticeably better, I don't understand how they could make things worse (assuming that it is well designed)...?
me neither :? unless it was improperly installed, or it was a poor design..

what kind of filter was used?
Old 11-02-2007, 12:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Greyhare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Greyhare is on a distinguished road
Default

The stock intake is not tweeked for performance. The stock intake is designed to reduce intake noise.

If you have a loss of power with a CAI it is most likely not properly shielded from engine bay heat.
Old 11-02-2007, 03:22 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
theJMFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Jenison, MI (Near Grand Rapids)
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
theJMFC is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Greyhare
The stock intake is not tweeked for performance. The stock intake is designed to reduce intake noise.
Right. That'* what I was trying to say last night in my groggy state.

The stock intake is "tuned" for low cost, low noise, and quick easy assembly on the line. Not tuned for performance.
Old 11-02-2007, 09:51 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
86 electra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
86 electra is on a distinguished road
Default

True but an intake thats over sized will cost low end torque due to reduced velocity causing the motor to work harder to take in a less dense air charge.

Most motors ar restreicted at the upper RPM range because it'* imposible to have a single design excel at both low and high revs. Given the obvious choice the OE'* go for the driveability of lower end torque.
Old 11-03-2007, 04:20 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
jbmark33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Edinboro, PA
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jbmark33 is on a distinguished road
Default

I think if we generalize things a little... this may help.
(Just trying to sum up what was said here)

Stock intakes have a large box with a rectangular filter. Why? To make a large V6 or any engine quieter.

Why do people gut the airbox? to increase flow.

If increasing flow isn't enough for some people, then they go for an increased air density.
The CAI setups if they are trully a "cold air" setup, increase air density. Air density is greater at lower temperatures.

No matter how large the intake is, it will never flow any better than it'* slowest part. (In this case, no matter how large the intake is, it will never flow any more than what the throttle body can flow)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Merlin 91/97
1987-1991
4
05-17-2003 02:53 PM
93-SSEI-
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
3
02-05-2003 10:10 PM
99BonnevilleSE
General GM Chat
15
10-14-2002 11:11 PM
CDecker
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
10
08-23-2002 12:58 PM
92BonnevilleSE
1992-1999
8
12-31-1969 07:00 PM



Quick Reply: my opinion on CAI VS STOCK INTAKES



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.