Cam / Rockers / IC ??
#31
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To get the most bang for your buck, get a cam. Headers will give your more for your money than ported manifolds will, especially with a cam.
#32
Senior Member
True Car Nut
thanks for the info. my buddy in the TCCOA said roughly the same thing. what'* the most aggressive combo of cam/rockers that can be used with stock heads?
#34
Ya, that'* were I am right now.
Torn between going for a cam or just going for the 1.9 rockers.
If I go for the rockers now then they are throw away for the cam where the max rocker ratio is 1.7.
Rogue - why did you go with the 1.6 ratio ?? What head work would be required to go to 1.7 ratio ?
The cam is really big bucks when you consider all the additional hardware.
Adjustable rockers, springs, pushrods, retainers, lifters, timing chain, gasket set and PCM upgrade.
......it'* still on my wishlist.
Torn between going for a cam or just going for the 1.9 rockers.
If I go for the rockers now then they are throw away for the cam where the max rocker ratio is 1.7.
Rogue - why did you go with the 1.6 ratio ?? What head work would be required to go to 1.7 ratio ?
The cam is really big bucks when you consider all the additional hardware.
Adjustable rockers, springs, pushrods, retainers, lifters, timing chain, gasket set and PCM upgrade.
......it'* still on my wishlist.
#35
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just on CGP browsing around, and I was looking at some of the times people were putting down, and the mods they were using. I've seen some people running high 12'* with an IC, 2.8", 1.9'*, opened exhaust, PCM, and a CAI. This seems like a good combination. Even though the Bonneville is a tad heavier, you would still be running times similar to this without ever touching a cam. So even if you have 1.9'* already, your next step would be to go with an IC ... however, your trans may not like it.
#36
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say save your money and do the cam, then the IC. That 3.4 pulley should keep you satisfied for awhile.
Wont you need headers before an IC? I thought you would get massive boost stack w/o them.
Wont you need headers before an IC? I thought you would get massive boost stack w/o them.
#37
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Genoa, Illinois
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by macho_mike21
I would say save your money and do the cam, then the IC. That 3.4 pulley should keep you satisfied for awhile.
Wont you need headers before an IC? I thought you would get massive boost stack w/o them.
Wont you need headers before an IC? I thought you would get massive boost stack w/o them.
#39
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Three Oaks, Michigan
Posts: 4,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I may as well lend my useless opinion. Cam will yeild the best results.. no matter what. If your cam is not in the best power range of the engine.. then you aren't making the most poewr. This is common knowledge. However, with the engine being mounted as it is. I have no clue how you could ever do the swap, without taking out the engine. When looking at my engine bay, even if I removed the washer fluid and coolant over flow bottles, there is still not enough room. I was just kinda wondering, would you have to remove the engine to swap cams?
-justin
-justin
#40
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by 2000SilverBullet
Rogue - why did you go with the 1.6 ratio ?? What head work would be required to go to 1.7 ratio ?
We changed the cam in my car without taking out the engine. It IS possible for the 00 year and I would assume for at least the 96-99.
You drop the passenger side of the engine cradle enough to slide the cam out the wheel well.