Cam/ Double Roller Question
#14
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From what I read the Rollermaster double roller is the only aftermarket (meaning not meant to be a stock replacement) timing set that does not fail more than stock. There is a ton of info on why others fail and what you should do to make them work correctly since the Aussie cranks they were designed for are different. I'll try and find it.
I've been running a stock timing chain on 90# springs and a GT1 cam for 80k+ miles. And for the 1st 10k I had stock retainers. (this was back in 04' I didn't know any better)
That said, I am going to try running without a balance shaft. I'm also going to run a ATI Harmonic Balancer I got for cheap. My idle is also going to be about 1k due to the larger cam I plan on running.
I've been running a stock timing chain on 90# springs and a GT1 cam for 80k+ miles. And for the 1st 10k I had stock retainers. (this was back in 04' I didn't know any better)
That said, I am going to try running without a balance shaft. I'm also going to run a ATI Harmonic Balancer I got for cheap. My idle is also going to be about 1k due to the larger cam I plan on running.
#17
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're not going Rollmaster or JP, then you should get a new stock chain and dampner.
Double rollers don't use dampners.
And at this point Rollmaster doubles are the only sets that seem to have a low failure rate.
I'm still trying to find more timing set info I know I saw a comprehensive post about it somewhere..