dyno results........these numbers seem weak
#1
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth WI
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dyno results........these numbers seem weak
209 fwhp @ 6150 rpm
241tq @ 3950 rpm
from 3750rpm on the a/f waas around 10.5
I know my numbers should be higher then this, so I need to find a way to tune this or if anyone has advice on what i can try, let me know. all feedback is welcome
241tq @ 3950 rpm
from 3750rpm on the a/f waas around 10.5
I know my numbers should be higher then this, so I need to find a way to tune this or if anyone has advice on what i can try, let me know. all feedback is welcome
#2
Retired Senior Admin
Expert Gearhead
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes
on
24 Posts
Re: dyno results........this is weak i need to know what to
Originally Posted by lammers
209 fwhp @ 6150 rpm
241tq @ 3950 rpm
from 3750rpm on the a/f waas around 10.5
I know my numbers should be higher then this, so I need to find a way to tune this or if anyone has advice on what i can try, let me know. all feedback is welcome
241tq @ 3950 rpm
from 3750rpm on the a/f waas around 10.5
I know my numbers should be higher then this, so I need to find a way to tune this or if anyone has advice on what i can try, let me know. all feedback is welcome
#5
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth WI
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i would think they would be higher, that is over 30percent powerloss form the crank.... looking at the a/f ratio isn;t 10.5 way too rich?
#6
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10.5 is a bit rich.
Depending on other mods to reduce KR I would run between 11:1 and 12:1.
I doubt being that rich is costing you more than 5hp.
Depending on other mods to reduce KR I would run between 11:1 and 12:1.
I doubt being that rich is costing you more than 5hp.
#7
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What kind of numbers were you expecting? How much hp and tq over stock do you expect your mods should be giving you?
IMO your mods should be giving you maybe 20 to 25 hp / tq over stock, and you are looking at maybe a 20% drivetrain loss right there...which is not too bad.
Lean that 10.5 AFR up some and you'll do better.
IMO your mods should be giving you maybe 20 to 25 hp / tq over stock, and you are looking at maybe a 20% drivetrain loss right there...which is not too bad.
Lean that 10.5 AFR up some and you'll do better.
#8
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wickliffe, Ohio
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those numbers aren't bad, most S2 L67s dyno 190-200whp. 10.5 a/f is pretty rich and is going to hurt power I think the sweet spot for power and safety on the L67s is 11.8. A good tune should help you out quite a bit.
Ed
Ed
#9
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth WI
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
with the mods i have i was thinking 25-30 over stock. for some reason i was thinking these engines produced 280 hp stock... This is where my nubers are bassed off, and this is why i am thinking that it was a terrible dyno result. sorry for the confusion. How do i go about tuning my car? what is the cheapest/best route to get it done?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Foghorn
General GM Chat
30
08-21-2005 03:22 PM