L67 Dynos
#4
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Thread Starter
right. the reason i ask though, is i have this feeling (nagging, really), that the HP is under-rated on the SII, and is almost (if not exactly) the same as the ratings for the SIII.
just a feeling.
just a feeling.
#6
Some performance magazine a few years back did an article on modern day muscle cars, in which they dyno'd them. If I remember correctly, an 01 GTP dyno'd at 196HP and 260lb/ft.
My Rivi is stock, except for a gutted airbox, and I will be taking it to the dyno shop in about a month to get it baselined before getting a 3.4" pulley, Evan'* coolant, new plugs, and a K&N. I will post results as soon as I get them.
My Rivi is stock, except for a gutted airbox, and I will be taking it to the dyno shop in about a month to get it baselined before getting a 3.4" pulley, Evan'* coolant, new plugs, and a K&N. I will post results as soon as I get them.
#8
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Posts: 5,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sol
If 260 ft-lbs are hitting the wheels in stock form, then the engine in stock form should be pushing well over the factory spec of 280 ft-lbs at the crank, correct?
#9
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sol
If 260 ft-lbs are hitting the wheels in stock form, then the engine in stock form should be pushing well over the factory spec of 280 ft-lbs at the crank, correct?
Shawn