WOW, camera phone...
#11
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
I'd still rather have a camera. That picture is fine if you didn't have access to a camera and really wanted the shot, but to me it'* not something I would want to print.
#12
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Pixel wise it'* ok, but the sensors are so small surface area wise. There is a lot of noise in those images above.
Nice to have it when you don't have a digi cam, but it'* no replacement for a std camera IMO..
And my razr SUCKS in low light.
Nice to have it when you don't have a digi cam, but it'* no replacement for a std camera IMO..
And my razr SUCKS in low light.
#13
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, there is definitely a little visual noise present, but when you drop the size down to a more manageable posting size, it becomes almost un-noticeable. It won't replace a good camera, but for casual snapping, it'* more than enough.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post