what's wrong with the corvette in this game
04-21-2008, 05:31 PM
#21
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fitchburg Ma _ToastedRice_
Posts: 6,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
without vehicle damage in GT, Forza will always be the BETTER SIMULATOR
besides... we all have first hand experience driving racecars so we can definately make a good comparison on the physics
besides... we all have first hand experience driving racecars so we can definately make a good comparison on the physics
04-21-2008, 06:58 PM
#23
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Originally Posted by petraman
Originally Posted by Allmachtige
Mmmm...Grand Sport. 
Thats the only vette from that era that I respect. Nice choice!
*off-topic*
When the GT series decides to have collision detection, modeling, and realism I'll consider it a respectable racing game.
Thats the only vette from that era that I respect. Nice choice!
*off-topic*
When the GT series decides to have collision detection, modeling, and realism I'll consider it a respectable racing game.
Originally Posted by ign
Polyphony has once again absolutely nailed how each and every car feels (and sounds), giving each vehicle a character and voice of its own. Cars will understeer or oversteer exactly as their real-world counterparts would and drive very, very predictably. You can almost always predict what your ride is going to do in any instance simply because everything works exactly as you'd expect it to. This may sound weird, but once you get behind the wheel of any of the game'* cars, you'll know what I mean.
04-22-2008, 02:20 PM
#24
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Genoa, Illinois
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I should clarify what I meant by realism. Collision realism, damage realism, etc etc.
It really takes away from the fun to be able to drive like an idiot in a game and it has no negative results.
Otherwise the GT series is fine, but damage is a big issue to me in racing games.
It really takes away from the fun to be able to drive like an idiot in a game and it has no negative results.
Otherwise the GT series is fine, but damage is a big issue to me in racing games.
04-23-2008, 12:42 AM
#25
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Granville, Ohio ~NEBF '07 Survivor~
Posts: 5,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Allmachtige
I should clarify what I meant by realism. Collision realism, damage realism, etc etc.
It really takes away from the fun to be able to drive like an idiot in a game and it has no negative results.
Otherwise the GT series is fine, but damage is a big issue to me in racing games.
It really takes away from the fun to be able to drive like an idiot in a game and it has no negative results.
Otherwise the GT series is fine, but damage is a big issue to me in racing games.
04-23-2008, 02:44 AM
#26
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I played both GT5 and Forza 2, and I like F2 better ONLY BECAUSE there is no improvement over GT2 and GT3 while F2 lets you watch suspension numbers change in replay mode. Plus, GT5 feels a little too arcade-like for me. There isn't as much tuning available right off the bat, and a lot of the good tracks are missing. It seems to be more like a Need For Speed game than GT.
04-23-2008, 04:41 AM
#27
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by radomirthegreat
I played both GT5 and Forza 2, and I like F2 better ONLY BECAUSE there is no improvement over GT2 and GT3 while F2 lets you watch suspension numbers change in replay mode. Plus, GT5 feels a little too arcade-like for me. There isn't as much tuning available right off the bat, and a lot of the good tracks are missing. It seems to be more like a Need For Speed game than GT.
I feel the opposite way. To me, FM2 feels too arcadey. I know this is a cliche, but GT5 gives you the feeling that the car is an extension of yourself, it just feels so natural. You just don't get that with FM2. Don't get me wrong, I like FM2, I just don't think it stacks up to GT5 in physics, or graphics. Especially graphics.
Another thing that gets me about FM2, is that even GT4 looks and plays better, even though it'* a PS2 game.
04-23-2008, 04:49 AM
#28
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do realize it'* a demo, but the real track list doesn't seem too cool either. I can't find the whole thing, though. Bits and pieces of it are all over the net.
I think GT4 is one of the best looking, best handling racing games I've played. However, I like GT3 better. If GT2 loaded faster and looked better, it would be the best GT ever made.
I think GT4 is one of the best looking, best handling racing games I've played. However, I like GT3 better. If GT2 loaded faster and looked better, it would be the best GT ever made.
04-23-2008, 08:53 AM
#29
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So back on topic, is the thread-starter going to elaborate on why this thread was started? It'* kinda like posting "Hay guess what I did today", and then never telling anyone... :?:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post