Star Trek 11
#12
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkShadow
my favorite star trek movie is undiscovered country hands down, captain kirk ftw
they need to make a movie based on voyager though :?
they need to make a movie based on voyager though :?
#14
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt it.
Plus just because of the temporal prime directive say goodbye to Armor technology and transphasic torpedos. Which means good old plain jane (no pun intended) voyager.
Plus just because of the temporal prime directive say goodbye to Armor technology and transphasic torpedos. Which means good old plain jane (no pun intended) voyager.
#16
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
IMO the more big names they throw at a movie the worse it is so this movie is already setup to bomb. (Matt Damon, Gary Sinise, Adrian Brody) .
Although I think Gary would make a great "Bones" I am not a Damon fan and no matter how hard I try I just cannot see him as Kirk. Nor can I see Brody making a good Scotty but thats probably just me.
And I don't really think I could stand another kirk movie; I'd rather have an Enterprise cast or Janeway cast movie. This is one I'll probably watch on tv if I've got nothing better to do.
I'm, sorry to be such a nay sayer here. I'm normally a fan.
Although I think Gary would make a great "Bones" I am not a Damon fan and no matter how hard I try I just cannot see him as Kirk. Nor can I see Brody making a good Scotty but thats probably just me.
And I don't really think I could stand another kirk movie; I'd rather have an Enterprise cast or Janeway cast movie. This is one I'll probably watch on tv if I've got nothing better to do.
I'm, sorry to be such a nay sayer here. I'm normally a fan.
#17
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OLDsman105
I doubt it.
Plus just because of the temporal prime directive say goodbye to Armor technology and transphasic torpedos. Which means good old plain jane (no pun intended) voyager.
Plus just because of the temporal prime directive say goodbye to Armor technology and transphasic torpedos. Which means good old plain jane (no pun intended) voyager.
I doubt Section 31 would let those be buried, starfleet would have to reverse engineer them so that they wouldn't apear as advanced technology, and I'm sure the details of Voyager getting help from the future would be covered up so as not to raise suspicion. Besides, even after Starfleet would have stripped Voyager of the technology it'* possible she could have been returned to service. Just saying, untill it'* made official in a story line there'* still hope it could be serving untill her decomission to museum status
#18
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with you on the section 31 thing. But if starfleet had decided to use some of the technology even in a simpliar sense. We would have seen it used on the Enterprise during Nemisis.
#19
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True. Good point.
unless the Enterprise was too high exposure of a testing platform with it being the flagship and as such more of a spectacle. Perhaps after the refit in would have needed after the events in Nemisis would have allowed time for such advancments to be implemented.
unless the Enterprise was too high exposure of a testing platform with it being the flagship and as such more of a spectacle. Perhaps after the refit in would have needed after the events in Nemisis would have allowed time for such advancments to be implemented.