Lets all point and laugh at the Tempo
07-07-2005, 08:54 AM
#21
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halifax, Canada 91SSE / 97SSEi
Posts: 5,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rosco the Iroc
It'* bad when you have to use a calander or a sundial to judge your 1/4mi times. 
07-07-2005, 09:37 AM
#22
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posts: 15,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rosco the Iroc
It'* bad when you have to use a calander or a sundial to judge your 1/4mi times.
Originally Posted by Rosco the Iroc
It'* bad when you have to use a calander or a sundial to judge your 1/4mi times.
RJolly: "Why bother?"
07-07-2005, 12:03 PM
#24
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Quincy, Ma
Posts: 15,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RareGMFan
Originally Posted by BillBost37
Never timed it. But it could take a 2.3 stang
07-07-2005, 01:20 PM
#25
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
you know mos, normally i dont like people making fun of me, but you are coming up with some REALLY good ones here, making it worth the while 
07-07-2005, 01:22 PM
#26
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See, my car is as slow as molasses rolling downhill in January.
The Tempo, on the other hand, is slow as molasses rolling UPHILL in January.
The Tempo, on the other hand, is slow as molasses rolling UPHILL in January.
07-07-2005, 01:23 PM
#27
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well i guess i feel really good about having a 6.6 second 0-60 in my car then. There is no way i could put up with anything slower than 7.5 seconds.
07-07-2005, 02:20 PM
#28
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by auroradude
Well i guess i feel really good about having a 6.6 second 0-60 in my car then. There is no way i could put up with anything slower than 7.5 seconds.
07-07-2005, 02:30 PM
#29
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Custom88
Originally Posted by auroradude
Well i guess i feel really good about having a 6.6 second 0-60 in my car then. There is no way i could put up with anything slower than 7.5 seconds.
what is the diff between the autobahn aurora and the regular anyway?
07-07-2005, 02:33 PM
#30
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Originally Posted by SSE14U24ME
Don't feel bad. Years ago I owned an 1987 Plymouth Reliant K car. I was having acceleration problems and it took me, what seemed like forever, to reach 40 mph. That was the fastest it would go and I was on a highway with the speedlimit of 65mph. It was so embarrasing and I got it fixed shortly thereafter. That car was Jeff'* first car (cuz I felt he might be prone to hit stuff) until his grandmother gave him his 1st bonneville.