GM halts all Future RWD Models due to new Cafe Standards
#12
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Farmington, Minnesota =MWBF '05 SURVIVOR= =CEBF '06 SURVIVOR= =August '06 COTM=
Posts: 9,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trucks are taking the hit.....Diesel light duty'* especially.......The 08 line of Dodge diesel'* are ready for it, but the tag definantly went up. The Ford diesel can't even run on next years supposed diesel. Apparrently they're changing it again.
I thought the GM was charging a "Gas Guzzler" tax on the GTO and such.....because they couldn't get the mileage requirements out of them?
I thought the GM was charging a "Gas Guzzler" tax on the GTO and such.....because they couldn't get the mileage requirements out of them?
#13
CAFE standards have nothing to do with responsibility. They're a "feel-good" solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
By artificially controlling MPG requirements, the government ensures two things:
1.) The automakers are going to start producing cars buyers don't want (the focus is now on meeting the regulations, not buyer'* needs)
2.) The cars that we DO want are about to become a lot more expensive. Fuel efficiency costs money.
There'* really no benefit for anyone in the end, except for a false sense that we all did the right thing. CAFE spells disaster for the American automakers as we know them.
Just what problem are we trying to solve anyways? Last I knew gasoline was cheaper in America than just about anywhere. If we're going to get serious about weening ourselves off of foreign oil, then we've got to make a better attempt than this *coughethanolcough*
By artificially controlling MPG requirements, the government ensures two things:
1.) The automakers are going to start producing cars buyers don't want (the focus is now on meeting the regulations, not buyer'* needs)
2.) The cars that we DO want are about to become a lot more expensive. Fuel efficiency costs money.
There'* really no benefit for anyone in the end, except for a false sense that we all did the right thing. CAFE spells disaster for the American automakers as we know them.
Just what problem are we trying to solve anyways? Last I knew gasoline was cheaper in America than just about anywhere. If we're going to get serious about weening ourselves off of foreign oil, then we've got to make a better attempt than this *coughethanolcough*
#14
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Originally Posted by LakevilleSSEi
I thought the GM was charging a "Gas Guzzler" tax on the GTO and such.....because they couldn't get the mileage requirements out of them?
#16
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NEBF:06,07 | NYBF:06,07 | ONBF:06,07 | CNBF:06 & more............
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yup... and this is why i think the Bonneville will be the last GM car i will own..
On to Dodge...
On to Dodge...
#17
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
Originally Posted by LakevilleSSEi
I thought the GM was charging a "Gas Guzzler" tax on the GTO and such.....because they couldn't get the mileage requirements out of them?
#18
Originally Posted by 95LHS
If we're going to get serious about weening ourselves off of foreign oil, then we've got to make a better attempt than this *coughethanolcough*
Hydrogen is even more ridiculous, as it would cost trillions to produce the infrastructure for it, and it only moves the energy demand to the power plants, which also burn fossil fuels.
Hybrids are the obvious way to go, but the logical choice for the fuel-burning motor is diesel, and the ever-changing small diesel emissions laws make it impossible for automakers to complete a development run between rules changes.
BMW is probably our big break for the answer to massive fuel mileage and emissions improvements. Their new engines use an electromechanically actuated valvetrain that makes massive horsepower possible because of the near infinite adjustability of the mix and timing. But they haven't taken the tech to the logical end. Even an educated layman like me can see that the adjustability of the motor could be used to wring incredible mileage out of the motor as well as incredible performance. With an O2 sensor for each cylinder, the mix and timing could be optimized for the individual cylinder, and you could even shut down cylinders when they aren't needed. You could make a V8 motor that could outperform anything on the market today, right up to the most exotic supercars, then settle down to cruise on less fuel than a 3cyl Metro, on the same gas.
Combine it with hybrid drivetrains, and voila, 100mpg car.
Tell you what though, you want to make a much bigger difference? There are 50 trucks on this lot right now where I'm spending the night. Every single one, including mine, is idling so the drivers can run their heaters. Diesel generators are available that would allow us drivers to shut down our engines and use 1/20th the amount of fuel over our required ten-hour break, while still running bunk heaters, block heaters, lights, and several thousand watts of electrical power for TVs, microwaves, refrigerators, and yes, laptop computers. Imagine, several million trucks, idiling at least ten hours, at least five nights a week. Now, mandate all new trucks with sleepers to come equipped with generators. Mandate a program to install generators on all currently running fleet trucks. Institute a subsidy for owner/ops to install generators, damn sure they all want to save fuel, just a matter of whether they have the money to spend now to save money later.
Imagine how much fuel that would save, and how much pollution would NOT be pumped into the atmosphere.
Now go to your local truckstop and look at those stupid IdleAire systems that are supposed to provide heat/AC and electricity so you can shut down your motor. Hmm, $3.00 per hour. $30 per night. Or $20 worth of fuel to idle, and only and unenforceable anti-idle law to sway me. This is what our current administration thinks will solve the problem. Yeah, uh huh.
#19
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern WV
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the bigger point here is that this exact attitude is why US auto producers are in the shape that they are in. They lost the innovative and creative spirit they had in the 50s and 60s.
The answer to the challenge is to innovate and create. Not sit back and rant. The Japanese are leading the way on hybrids and alternatives and they innovate and create cars that people (not me, but many people) want. The point is, instead of looking at this as a challenge that could reap enormous market share through the re-birth of the US auto industry, top execs sit back and moan and groan like the 400 pound fat guy that just had a heart attack and doesn't understand why he can't keep eating Big Macs.
It'* attitude. And, sadly, GM and Ford have lost it. This is really a tragedy given the fact that the US automakers excel in styling. I love the look of Pontiacs, but I am sure that rising gas prices mean that when one of the Bonnevilles die, it will be replaced with a crappy, blandly styled, 40mpg "everybody" car. Why couldn't GM come out with a big V6/V8 hyrbid, let'* say like...Lexus???
Attitude.
The answer to the challenge is to innovate and create. Not sit back and rant. The Japanese are leading the way on hybrids and alternatives and they innovate and create cars that people (not me, but many people) want. The point is, instead of looking at this as a challenge that could reap enormous market share through the re-birth of the US auto industry, top execs sit back and moan and groan like the 400 pound fat guy that just had a heart attack and doesn't understand why he can't keep eating Big Macs.
It'* attitude. And, sadly, GM and Ford have lost it. This is really a tragedy given the fact that the US automakers excel in styling. I love the look of Pontiacs, but I am sure that rising gas prices mean that when one of the Bonnevilles die, it will be replaced with a crappy, blandly styled, 40mpg "everybody" car. Why couldn't GM come out with a big V6/V8 hyrbid, let'* say like...Lexus???
Attitude.
#20
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NEBF:06,07 | NYBF:06,07 | ONBF:06,07 | CNBF:06 & more............
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
two bonnies. Well Wrote
Yup, thats why im liking Dodge a lot better now. RWD, Big V8. Lots of Power... Cant go wrong.
And theres cars over in Europe that get like 40MPG and make like 350HP and go 0-60 in under 6sec... just that USA doesn't want then for some reason
Yup, thats why im liking Dodge a lot better now. RWD, Big V8. Lots of Power... Cant go wrong.
And theres cars over in Europe that get like 40MPG and make like 350HP and go 0-60 in under 6sec... just that USA doesn't want then for some reason