Best Ways To Invade Canada
09-18-2005, 02:30 AM
#35
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brunswick, Georgia, USA, North American Continent, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, time to pull out the 'tactical nuke' of this little war of words...
Listen, Canucks: When you 'beat' us (read: we withdrew) it was because big brother Britain had your back. Not to mention it was an ill-conceived operation to begin with. If we had really been serious, and your sugar-daddy Britain hadn't come to the rescue...
AND, let'* face it, geography is NOT on Canada'* side: You got about 15% of the arable, useful land on this continent. Sorry, that wasteland that encompasses most of YOUR country doesn't count. The US, on the other hand, got about 60% (Latin America is in there somewhere). Also, your kick-*** healthcare is no match for our burgeoning land and sea-based nuclear arsenal, state-of-the-art armed forces, and excellent military track record. Canada, on the other hand, get'* stuff we decommission (that'* the fancy way of saying they get table scraps). Also, 90% of Canada'* population is within a short B-52 flight of the US. Toss in the fact you guys have a large, French-derived population base in your country, not a nationality known for winning wars (Napolean was Corsican, so don't try and give me that bullshit) and you have a war that'll last... about as long as it takes for our troops to get past Canadian customs and Quebec to break away and independently sue for peace. So, figure about a week or so...
Listen, Canucks: When you 'beat' us (read: we withdrew) it was because big brother Britain had your back. Not to mention it was an ill-conceived operation to begin with. If we had really been serious, and your sugar-daddy Britain hadn't come to the rescue...
AND, let'* face it, geography is NOT on Canada'* side: You got about 15% of the arable, useful land on this continent. Sorry, that wasteland that encompasses most of YOUR country doesn't count. The US, on the other hand, got about 60% (Latin America is in there somewhere). Also, your kick-*** healthcare is no match for our burgeoning land and sea-based nuclear arsenal, state-of-the-art armed forces, and excellent military track record. Canada, on the other hand, get'* stuff we decommission (that'* the fancy way of saying they get table scraps). Also, 90% of Canada'* population is within a short B-52 flight of the US. Toss in the fact you guys have a large, French-derived population base in your country, not a nationality known for winning wars (Napolean was Corsican, so don't try and give me that bullshit) and you have a war that'll last... about as long as it takes for our troops to get past Canadian customs and Quebec to break away and independently sue for peace. So, figure about a week or so...
09-18-2005, 02:33 AM
#36
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brunswick, Georgia, USA, North American Continent, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh yea, and one other thing...
Hemm hemm..I live in the US so there'* definatly no way all your women are more attactive then some of us US women 
.
There'* no way to know without proof of such an assertion, Jeanie
Originally Posted by Princess Jeanie
Originally Posted by Jim W
Lotsa room!
It'* great here, and we have a sense of humour. And our women are more attractive
It'* great here, and we have a sense of humour. And our women are more attractive
.
09-18-2005, 02:44 AM
#37
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seton Hall University, NJ
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Merlin 91/97
Here'* another reason why Canada is better then the USA....... and the USA would be foolish to invade us....
.
09-18-2005, 04:19 AM
#39
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wickliffe, Ohio
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seriously though, with Canada'* drinking age at 19, a national health care plan( HMO insurance!)and the political BS in the states, I know a lot of people who seriously think about moving to the Great White North.
.Ed
09-18-2005, 09:36 AM
#40
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Krazy Kyle
Okay, time to pull out the 'tactical nuke' of this little war of words...
Listen, Canucks: When you 'beat' us (read: we withdrew) it was because big brother Britain had your back. Not to mention it was an ill-conceived operation to begin with. If we had really been serious, and your sugar-daddy Britain hadn't come to the rescue... AND, let'* face it, geography is NOT on Canada'* side: You got about 15% of the arable, useful land on this continent. Sorry, that wasteland that encompasses most of YOUR country doesn't count. The US, on the other hand, got about 60% (Latin America is in there somewhere). Also, your kick-A$$ healthcare is no match for our burgeoning land and sea-based nuclear arsenal, state-of-the-art armed forces, and excellent military track record. Canada, on the other hand, get'* stuff we decommission (that'* the fancy way of saying they get table scraps). Also, 90% of Canada'* population is within a short B-52 flight of the US. Toss in the fact you guys have a large, French-derived population base in your country, not a nationality known for winning wars (Napolean was Corsican, so don't try and give me that bullshit) and you have a war that'll last... about as long as it takes for our troops to get past Canadian customs and Quebec to break away and independently sue for peace. So, figure about a week or so...
Listen, Canucks: When you 'beat' us (read: we withdrew) it was because big brother Britain had your back. Not to mention it was an ill-conceived operation to begin with. If we had really been serious, and your sugar-daddy Britain hadn't come to the rescue...
AND, let'* face it, geography is NOT on Canada'* side: You got about 15% of the arable, useful land on this continent. Sorry, that wasteland that encompasses most of YOUR country doesn't count. The US, on the other hand, got about 60% (Latin America is in there somewhere). Also, your kick-A$$ healthcare is no match for our burgeoning land and sea-based nuclear arsenal, state-of-the-art armed forces, and excellent military track record. Canada, on the other hand, get'* stuff we decommission (that'* the fancy way of saying they get table scraps). Also, 90% of Canada'* population is within a short B-52 flight of the US. Toss in the fact you guys have a large, French-derived population base in your country, not a nationality known for winning wars (Napolean was Corsican, so don't try and give me that bullshit) and you have a war that'll last... about as long as it takes for our troops to get past Canadian customs and Quebec to break away and independently sue for peace. So, figure about a week or so...