AutoCad 2000
11-05-2007, 03:19 PM
#11
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From all I've seen, relatively speaking AutoCAD for 3D blows goats. 
I started life with version 2006 when they added the "DYN" dynamic input...
I started life with version 2006 when they added the "DYN" dynamic input...
11-05-2007, 03:28 PM
#12
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
I've been using CAD since version 9
Version 14 was king of all kings, only weakness was binding external references (patch from Autodesk fixed it)
Since then 2000, Arch. Desktop, 2002, 2004 (I use at home), 2006 ( I use at work) and 2007 (which I have yet refuse to install)
Its my bread and butter software and pretty much the standard in the architectural community. Its easy to learn the basics, but it'* very powerful overall with a wide possibility of customization features.
Rob, what are you using it for?
Version 14 was king of all kings, only weakness was binding external references (patch from Autodesk fixed it)
Since then 2000, Arch. Desktop, 2002, 2004 (I use at home), 2006 ( I use at work) and 2007 (which I have yet refuse to install)
Its my bread and butter software and pretty much the standard in the architectural community. Its easy to learn the basics, but it'* very powerful overall with a wide possibility of customization features.
Rob, what are you using it for?
11-05-2007, 03:40 PM
#13
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere south of Ottawa with your girlfriend driving faster then you.
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim W
I've been using CAD since version 9
Version 14 was king of all kings, only weakness was binding external references (patch from Autodesk fixed it)
Since then 2000, Arch. Desktop, 2002, 2004 (I use at home), 2006 ( I use at work) and 2007 (which I have yet refuse to install)
Its my bread and butter software and pretty much the standard in the architectural community. Its easy to learn the basics, but it'* very powerful overall with a wide possibility of customization features.
Rob, what are you using it for?
Version 14 was king of all kings, only weakness was binding external references (patch from Autodesk fixed it)
Since then 2000, Arch. Desktop, 2002, 2004 (I use at home), 2006 ( I use at work) and 2007 (which I have yet refuse to install)
Its my bread and butter software and pretty much the standard in the architectural community. Its easy to learn the basics, but it'* very powerful overall with a wide possibility of customization features.
Rob, what are you using it for?
11-05-2007, 10:22 PM
#14
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have Autocad 08, and rarely use it cause most of my stuff is 3D.
85% of my work is SolidWorks 2007 (even though my school doesnt teach it)
10% is Solid Edge (for SolidEdge class or anything that needs welding symbols)
5% is various other programs i know like Autocad and Inventor
85% of my work is SolidWorks 2007 (even though my school doesnt teach it)
10% is Solid Edge (for SolidEdge class or anything that needs welding symbols)
5% is various other programs i know like Autocad and Inventor
11-05-2007, 10:46 PM
#17
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by J Wikoff
What about Autodesk? Autocad that is more 3D, I was taught it after Autocad.;
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post