which one of these cars ran better
03-07-2006, 09:25 PM
#2
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Farmington, Minnesota =MWBF '05 SURVIVOR= =CEBF '06 SURVIVOR= =August '06 COTM=
Posts: 9,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say left one in my book
Other one looks a lil too lean and may possibly had been burning coolant.
Other one looks a lil too lean and may possibly had been burning coolant.
03-07-2006, 10:03 PM
#3
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, _______Canada._______ West Coast Bonneville Fest ___05,06,07 Survivor___
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Left for sure. The one on the right was DEFINTALLY running too lean, causing hot exhaust gasses, causing the white chared look
03-09-2006, 09:38 AM
#9
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Arizona. Snowboarder. Happy Shredding.
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ditto them ^
thing is...if i had a choice, i'd definitely prefer a bit rich...even though it fouls things up, it is less damaging than runnig seriously lean.
thing is...if i had a choice, i'd definitely prefer a bit rich...even though it fouls things up, it is less damaging than runnig seriously lean.
03-09-2006, 09:45 AM
#10
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS
Expert Gearhead
Originally Posted by Mr Bean
ditto them ^
thing is...if i had a choice, i'd definitely prefer a bit rich...even though it fouls things up, it is less damaging than runnig seriously lean.
thing is...if i had a choice, i'd definitely prefer a bit rich...even though it fouls things up, it is less damaging than runnig seriously lean.
Rich can clog a cat and kill it.
Both are bad...but yes..rich is probably the lesser damaging one.