my dad is thinking off trading his 1990 SHO for 1999 Aurora
#24
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moemar
Don't care what you say, a SHO is still a gay ugly Taurus and would rather own a Chevy or another GM car any day.
#26
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nuthin' wrong with that. Personally, I'm not for or against any makes. They all have good cars, and they all have bad ones. I'm just for all the good ones.
#28
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would take the SHO . thats right you heard me. Why, you ask. Because I like lighter cars. I like quickness in my cars, not just in the straight away, but also in the corners. I'm sure the SHO handles better and has superior road feel to the Aura.
Don't get me wrong for most people the Aura is a way better car, but I don't really care bout luxury items or comfort. I wanna feel the damn road!!!!! (did I mention a stick shift doesn't come on a Aura)
Don't get me wrong for most people the Aura is a way better car, but I don't really care bout luxury items or comfort. I wanna feel the damn road!!!!! (did I mention a stick shift doesn't come on a Aura)
#29
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
You'd be suprised how much of the road I actually feel in my Aurora, well I just did ge new shocks, so ya, but if you don't want fluff get the SHO.
I like fluff...lol
I like fluff...lol
#30
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my point exactly. you like fluff. and me... well let me put it this way... I like my car to feel like my arse is scrapin the damn ground. thats how much road feel i want.