I Need Advice
#12
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ga93sle
Wasn't the Ford 3.8 a bit bigger than GM?
EDIT: According to the same site I got the info from above, the 97 T-bird 3.8 was 3797cc, 5cc less than the 96 T-bird :?
Either way, 3800 owns it.
#13
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elberton, GA
Posts: 5,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bonnie94sse
Originally Posted by ga93sle
Wasn't the Ford 3.8 a bit bigger than GM?
EDIT: According to the same site I got the info from above, the 97 T-bird 3.8 was 3797cc, 5cc less than the 96 T-bird :?
Either way, 3800 owns it.
#14
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok well a ford 3.8 non */c will get its a$$ handed to it by a stock 96 sle (have done it many times to a kid with a full cat back, and intake), but my bro has a 92 T-bird SuperCoupe and let me tell u, that thing has torque comin out all ends so i'd have to say a 93 ssei would have problem keepin up with a t-bird */c w/o any mods, but any series 2 n/a is about dead even with a T-bird */c (T-bird runs 15.6 96 sle runs 15....
but i must admit that RWD T-bird can make some nice burnouts/donut trails...and they are really fun to drive so i have to say from experience that its hard to dis them, they are really nice cars
but i must admit that RWD T-bird can make some nice burnouts/donut trails...and they are really fun to drive so i have to say from experience that its hard to dis them, they are really nice cars
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mr Bean
General GM Chat
5
11-22-2002 03:21 PM