Give You Supercharged Engine What it Wants!
#131
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego,Ca
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buzz38
Green... More then likely you had a headwind coming north and tailwind heading south. That is the weather pattern in this area as you went by Tracy which is where I grew up. I have been thinking on the colder denser charge theory your talking about. I am not sold on the greater O2 content of cold air. What I really think happens with a colder charge (and kinda goes back to the original topic of this thread) is that the pcm can add more timing because with a cold charge you have less pre-ignition or detonation. The only way to add O2 that I know of is forced induction or nitrous. I also understand that you are trying to improve "your" situation. It just needs to be pointed out as such because you talking of doing research and tests on it and people could come to the conclusion that it will work for them. Good luck in your hunt....
I think your idea of the winds maybe a factor, but it'* not that strong all the way down the state that would account for the a 10% difference, at least I don't think, but it certainly is possible.
As far as oxygenation, I read that it will affect gas mileage by as much as 10%. Especially SO Ca is one of the worst in the country because of Los Angeles, and the gas is among the most expensive as well because of the "special reformulation".
#132
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northern Ca.
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuel...etin/motorgas/
This is a link I found pertaining to oxygenated fuels. Check the question and answer section for some interesting reads on current topics.
This is a link I found pertaining to oxygenated fuels. Check the question and answer section for some interesting reads on current topics.
#133
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego,Ca
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buzz38
http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuels/bulletin/motorgas/
This is a link I found pertaining to oxygenated fuels. Check the question and answer section for some interesting reads on current topics.
This is a link I found pertaining to oxygenated fuels. Check the question and answer section for some interesting reads on current topics.
Good find. I read on the fuel economy page that for Ca gas they believe it to have a 3% reduction in fuel economy, but some individual drivers have reported from 10 to 20% reduction. They write it off as anecdotal, because they claim most drivers don't keep careful records. I can certainly see that as a possiblity, and in my case that is true, but I preceived a fairly significant drop in mileage when I moved from San Jose to San Diego. I haven't found proof yet, but it seems like * Ca. gas is weaker than N Ca. gas. I wonder if that is published anywhere.
I would also guess that even though the gas itself has a 3% reduction in heat value, depending on how the PCM was programmed, it may perceive a greater reduction and overcompensate for the weaker fuel. Maybe later models take this into consideration, but models made before oxygenation became a standard don't know how to efficiently compensate for this oxygenated fuel. That'* the way it looks to me. Is there an aftermarket chip out there made to compensate for this? I'd buy one if there was.
Here'* the section I read on fuel economy. The California part of it is especially revealing.
http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuel...p#fuel_economy
#134
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys, I just got my internet turned back on..signal dropped to near 0 for some odd reason..anyway
Time is short again so here'* a little bit...
This is JMO and totally up for debate..."not the D word!" haha
GreenMachine - Too much to comment on line by line but a few points to consider...
Hot air has less 'content' and the MAF (and o2) will pick up the difference and the computer will compensate by using less fuel. I've heard of 2-3gr/sec per 10deg difference. So a CAI with a 80deg intake vs. pulling 140deg hot air could make a difference of 120-180gr/sec which will make an impact on fuel usage..not entirely sure how minute though.
K&N - I think the vast majority of 'improvement' in MPG seen switching filters it just because they put a new one in. I think the only way to really check the difference is to use a brand new cheap-o filter vs. a brand new K&N. But then again some of that will be because of lower parasitic losses (?!?).
On oxygenation...The "official" statement is "no more than 3%" loss in mpg but I've been reading as much as 3-5mpg. Of course the government will use a PERFECT running little engine and an extremely light foot in their tests. Also it will depend on how much oxygen is added.
"Federal Clean Air Act - requires gasoline to have a year-round average of 2% by weight of oxygen in ozone non-attainment areas categorized as "extreme" and "severe" (e.g., Sacramento, eastern Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino counties). The CAA also requires an oxygenated fuel that contains 2.7% oxygen by weight in areas categorized as non-attainment for carbon monoxide (only a concern in Los Angeles). "
Time is short again so here'* a little bit...
This is JMO and totally up for debate..."not the D word!" haha
GreenMachine - Too much to comment on line by line but a few points to consider...
Hot air has less 'content' and the MAF (and o2) will pick up the difference and the computer will compensate by using less fuel. I've heard of 2-3gr/sec per 10deg difference. So a CAI with a 80deg intake vs. pulling 140deg hot air could make a difference of 120-180gr/sec which will make an impact on fuel usage..not entirely sure how minute though.
K&N - I think the vast majority of 'improvement' in MPG seen switching filters it just because they put a new one in. I think the only way to really check the difference is to use a brand new cheap-o filter vs. a brand new K&N. But then again some of that will be because of lower parasitic losses (?!?).
On oxygenation...The "official" statement is "no more than 3%" loss in mpg but I've been reading as much as 3-5mpg. Of course the government will use a PERFECT running little engine and an extremely light foot in their tests. Also it will depend on how much oxygen is added.
"Federal Clean Air Act - requires gasoline to have a year-round average of 2% by weight of oxygen in ozone non-attainment areas categorized as "extreme" and "severe" (e.g., Sacramento, eastern Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino counties). The CAA also requires an oxygenated fuel that contains 2.7% oxygen by weight in areas categorized as non-attainment for carbon monoxide (only a concern in Los Angeles). "
#135
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego,Ca
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DrJay
On oxygenation...The "official" statement is "no more than 3%" loss in mpg but I've been reading as much as 3-5mpg. Of course the government will use a PERFECT running little engine and an extremely light foot in their tests. Also it will depend on how much oxygen is added.
#136
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've typed a little something out about the filter dilly in another thread. Debate shift! haha
http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/...ic.php?t=24211
Up for thoughts on this one
http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/...ic.php?t=24211
Up for thoughts on this one
#137
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GreenMachine
Originally Posted by Buzz38
Green... More then likely you had a headwind coming north and tailwind heading south. That is the weather pattern in this area as you went by Tracy which is where I grew up. I have been thinking on the colder denser charge theory your talking about. I am not sold on the greater O2 content of cold air. What I really think happens with a colder charge (and kinda goes back to the original topic of this thread) is that the pcm can add more timing because with a cold charge you have less pre-ignition or detonation. The only way to add O2 that I know of is forced induction or nitrous. I also understand that you are trying to improve "your" situation. It just needs to be pointed out as such because you talking of doing research and tests on it and people could come to the conclusion that it will work for them. Good luck in your hunt....
#138
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northern Ca.
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys are gonna make me wish I had paid attention in science and chemistry. Is the density of the air contributed to the oxygen content or the speed of the molecules in it?
#139
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha thats ok, I just guess right a lot
Both actually, when something heats up the 'little bits' speed up and move apart. When they cool they slow down and bunch together. Using this to your advantage - Pump gas late at night when its cold
Both actually, when something heats up the 'little bits' speed up and move apart. When they cool they slow down and bunch together. Using this to your advantage - Pump gas late at night when its cold
#140
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DrJay
haha thats ok, I just guess right a lot
Both actually, when something heats up the 'little bits' speed up and move apart. When they cool they slow down and bunch together. Using this to your advantage - Pump gas late at night when its cold
Both actually, when something heats up the 'little bits' speed up and move apart. When they cool they slow down and bunch together. Using this to your advantage - Pump gas late at night when its cold