General GM Chat When starting new posts, please specify YEAR, MAKE, MODEL, ENGINE type, and whatever modifications you have made. Chat about all things GM (and related cars). Off-topic stuff should be in the Lounge, and all Model specific mechanical problems should be posted in the proper forum.

Did GM miss the boat not using 3.8L in RWD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2015, 06:42 AM
  #1  
Retired Administrator

True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
GunsOfNavarone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 2,906
Received 193 Likes on 149 Posts
GunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud of
Default Did GM miss the boat not using 3.8L in RWD?

Many of us think the 3.8L engine was an awesome engine. Super reliable, fuel efficient, factory supercharge option availability. Lots of ways to get more horsepower and torque out of it. I have often wondered why a SC 3.8L was not used in GM mid size trucks/ SUVs instead of the thirsty 4.3L.

I know AMC planed on using the 3.8L in RWD configuration- but never saw one installed. Came across a SC 3.8L installed in a RWD configuration- shows it can be done..
Lotus Super Seven Brunton Super Stalker | eBay
Old 03-28-2015, 06:54 AM
  #2  
Retired



Certified Car Nut
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dark Side, AZ
Posts: 17,920
Received 1,780 Likes on 1,304 Posts
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

It was used in some RWD configurations such as the Firebird.

As far as platforms goes, I'm not sure why either.

3.8 L36 Series II 205HP with 230ftlb torque.

4.3 L35 Vortec 190HP with 250ftlb torque.

I think GM wanted reliability to remain in the SUV/truck environment so they stayed with the 4.3 because its based on the very reliable Chevy 350.
__________________
Retired Administrator
2002 *-10 5.7 V8
2023 Jeep Rubicon Diesel

Old 03-28-2015, 07:02 AM
  #3  
Retired Administrator

True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
GunsOfNavarone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 2,906
Received 193 Likes on 149 Posts
GunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud of
Default

Wow, didn't know the 3.8L was a RWD option for some GM models. Makes sense why the custom car linked above is using a trans out of a Camaro.

Maybe your next project is to take the V8 out of your S10 and install a 3.8????
Old 03-28-2015, 07:07 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
rjolly87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 7,270
Received 457 Likes on 359 Posts
rjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant future
Default

I think there was some Holdens that did that with the series 1 (only they called it series 2). I will have to remember to look into it later
Old 03-28-2015, 07:20 AM
  #5  
Retired



Certified Car Nut
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dark Side, AZ
Posts: 17,920
Received 1,780 Likes on 1,304 Posts
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

A 3.8 in my S10? If I were to conduct such a swap, I would want to do it with a 2WD S10 vs the 4WD S10. The truck is a couple hundred pounds lighter than the 4wd version.

I think that would be pretty neat to drop a L67 in an S10.
__________________
Retired Administrator
2002 *-10 5.7 V8
2023 Jeep Rubicon Diesel

Old 03-29-2015, 12:20 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
rjolly87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 7,270
Received 457 Likes on 359 Posts
rjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant future
Default

I found it, it was the Holden Commodore they did it in. It was the engine between the V6, and the V8, even though the V8 only had 4 more ponies from the info I saw. I can't tell if it'* series 1 or 2 design, but they sound pretty awesome with dual exhaust. Definitely something to look in to also.
The following users liked this post:
GunsOfNavarone (03-29-2015)
Old 03-29-2015, 09:28 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
rjolly87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 7,270
Received 457 Likes on 359 Posts
rjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant future
Default


Quite frankly, I like that noise...
Old 03-29-2015, 09:59 AM
  #8  
Retired



Certified Car Nut
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dark Side, AZ
Posts: 17,920
Received 1,780 Likes on 1,304 Posts
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I got cheese to go with all that whine!
__________________
Retired Administrator
2002 *-10 5.7 V8
2023 Jeep Rubicon Diesel

Old 03-30-2015, 12:13 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

True Car Nut
 
Tech II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Worcester, Ma.
Posts: 2,878
Received 1,084 Likes on 832 Posts
Tech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond reputeTech II has a reputation beyond repute
Default

They missed the boat when they did not make improvements on the engine.....solid engine, plenty of power, few problems......give me a 3.8 with SC'er over a Northstar any day......GM customers certainly wouldn't be complaining about repair costs on the 3.8, like they do on the Northstar....

Don't get me started on the Solstice, the 4200 engine, G8, dropping the Riv(not making a 4 door version), dropping the Bonneville, not developing a small compact when the market needed it, etc.
Old 03-30-2015, 01:40 PM
  #10  
Retired Administrator

True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
GunsOfNavarone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 2,906
Received 193 Likes on 149 Posts
GunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud ofGunsOfNavarone has much to be proud of
Default

Tech II,

What are your thoughts on the G8?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Purplehazeir
Lounge
3
12-30-2009 06:57 PM
putertopia
Lounge
8
04-29-2008 10:40 AM
radomirthegreat
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
7
11-29-2007 05:06 PM
asonofabeach69
General GM Chat
17
05-27-2005 09:13 AM
speedyguy
General GM Chat
17
11-09-2002 02:24 PM



Quick Reply: Did GM miss the boat not using 3.8L in RWD?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 PM.