Did GM ever make....
#11
I can't help but notice how restrictive the bend behind the TB looks, though. And it would be almost impossible to intake-port that casing. Iwnoder if a swap to an M112 from a Cobra is possible? It is an Eaton, after all...probably would need a spacer, but I think the bend on the Cobra version is shorter and more open inside...
#15
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Climax Springs, Missouri
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by driverjohn2005
What about the 3.8L V6 in the Firebird
An L67/L32 that wasn't mounted transverse?
I always thought it would be cool to do a top end swap on a 5-spd manual Camaro or Firebird, but I dont think its physically possible.
#16
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: burb of detroit. 2 miles north of 8 mile Rd.
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Allmachtige
What car is that picture of? Changing the plugs would be wonderful in that engine bay.
#19
Which is basically an upspec. Commodore. This one is VT, VX or VY - 1997-2003. I'm guessing, by the color and the way some of the parts in the engine bay are laid out, it'* a VX. Picture a fatter late '90'* Cadillac Catera (with an L67); the two look very similar but, having seen an Opel Omega and VT side by side, they are actually significantly different. You guys would know this version as a 4-door version of the re-released Pontiac GTO - the GTO, or Monaro in Aust., was spun off the sedan platform. There are also wagon, utility and a long wheelbase (otherwise identical) luxury version: the Statesman. The transmission is the 4L60E. The L67 was only sold in the sedans, as far as I know. Auto. only with L67.
This is the second Commodore (actually only Calais and Statesman) body shape that the L67 was sold in. The first was the VS - sold between 1995 and 1997. This shape was smaller and about 120kg (260lbs) lighter. Consequently it was faster, even with all the luxury options. (Does that make two cars by GM with RWD L67'*)?
Parts of the chassis/floorpan of this earlier model date back to an Opel (GM Europe) derived car, first released in Australia, with local drivetrains, in 1978. (It'* a grandfather'* axe though; the body was significantly updated in 1988 - a "Top Hat" model update - and a completely new front suspension (1993) and IRS (1992) rear were introduced with intermediate models).
The later suspension designs were carried across fundamentally unchanged into the VT-VY shape ie. also the GTO, although there was an extra "toe control link" added to the rear supension around 2000, which the GTO should also have.
It is generally accepted that the L67 is as fast or faster than the Australian 5.0L V8 versions of the equivalent models but it was sold as a mid range engine option between the L36 and the V8. The performance was kept quiet by the marketing types and only sold in the heavier upspec. models. The LS1, introduced in 1998 or 1999, replacing the Aust. V8s (5.0L + 5.7L), was/is faster than the L67.
Yep, the */C housing, rather than just an adaptor, is different to the US models but what is basically the same car was sold in LHD form to markets in the Middle East. I don't know if the L67 was ever made available as an option there (definitely L36 and LS1) but a one off VT (about 199 version with an L67 was built by GM Australia (Holden) in LHD and used by an Australian car magazine to drive around Europe and the US and compare against the local cars. There might have been some coverage in Road and Track around that time as I still have a copies of the (Aust.) magazine articles and writers from Road and Track compared (briefly) the car with an L67 Grand Prix GTP and a Taurus SHO.
It might be interesting for you guys to look at the coolant pipe that you can just see to the left of the alternator in the picture (the bleed screw should make it obvious). That extends to the back of the engine and passes around behind the */C to connect with the thermostat housing under the pipe connecting TB-*/C. I think that the thermostat housing is specific to this model too. It is definitely an engine designed for FWD use converted to RWD. The installation is similar in this respect to the early versions of the Buick V6 sold in commodores.
This is the second Commodore (actually only Calais and Statesman) body shape that the L67 was sold in. The first was the VS - sold between 1995 and 1997. This shape was smaller and about 120kg (260lbs) lighter. Consequently it was faster, even with all the luxury options. (Does that make two cars by GM with RWD L67'*)?
Parts of the chassis/floorpan of this earlier model date back to an Opel (GM Europe) derived car, first released in Australia, with local drivetrains, in 1978. (It'* a grandfather'* axe though; the body was significantly updated in 1988 - a "Top Hat" model update - and a completely new front suspension (1993) and IRS (1992) rear were introduced with intermediate models).
The later suspension designs were carried across fundamentally unchanged into the VT-VY shape ie. also the GTO, although there was an extra "toe control link" added to the rear supension around 2000, which the GTO should also have.
It is generally accepted that the L67 is as fast or faster than the Australian 5.0L V8 versions of the equivalent models but it was sold as a mid range engine option between the L36 and the V8. The performance was kept quiet by the marketing types and only sold in the heavier upspec. models. The LS1, introduced in 1998 or 1999, replacing the Aust. V8s (5.0L + 5.7L), was/is faster than the L67.
Yep, the */C housing, rather than just an adaptor, is different to the US models but what is basically the same car was sold in LHD form to markets in the Middle East. I don't know if the L67 was ever made available as an option there (definitely L36 and LS1) but a one off VT (about 199 version with an L67 was built by GM Australia (Holden) in LHD and used by an Australian car magazine to drive around Europe and the US and compare against the local cars. There might have been some coverage in Road and Track around that time as I still have a copies of the (Aust.) magazine articles and writers from Road and Track compared (briefly) the car with an L67 Grand Prix GTP and a Taurus SHO.
It might be interesting for you guys to look at the coolant pipe that you can just see to the left of the alternator in the picture (the bleed screw should make it obvious). That extends to the back of the engine and passes around behind the */C to connect with the thermostat housing under the pipe connecting TB-*/C. I think that the thermostat housing is specific to this model too. It is definitely an engine designed for FWD use converted to RWD. The installation is similar in this respect to the early versions of the Buick V6 sold in commodores.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
goldfinger22
General GM Chat
20
01-04-2010 01:32 PM