Good points. There comes a point in everyone'* life that you decide to either be a part of society or a particular community or not. If you like BC, and you want to stay here, you follow the rules. Not just that, you BECOME part of the community by acting like a part of it.
Rather than touting unproven claims that invite flames continually, even after an Admin tells you to remove the claim from your signature or produce a timeslip, you come to realize that maybe it'* not a good idea. Repeated problems are a sure way to find the door swinging toward'* your arse.
In addition, the other party involved in the issue was REPEATEDLY told by more than one Moderator to get the signature within the new requirements or lose it. I was told about it after the umpteenth PM, so I simply deleted the signature and PM'd JL about it. He took it as a personal attack.
Funny, I COULD have taken away his right to a signature entirely, and chose not to. What did he do? Bitched in public, turned my Administrative action into an apparent personal attack, and put his 'violation' signature right back in his profile.
Now back on topic, what is everyone'* impressions and feelings on the new NOTICE? Too harsh, not harsh enough?