h-body
#21
LSS - Went on trip with family this weekend and spent some time around the trunk so I finally pulled the trunk mat back and checked on suspension code - F41- yikes, I was figuring because it was still kinda floaty with some body roll maybe it was not F41. New struts would help some maybe but ours are not shot by anymeans. Well, no one said it was a Corvette its a luxury car. Great trip - route 30 up through the Adirondacks - excellent curvy, scenic mountain road.
Are these newer F41 springs variable rate ?
Are these newer F41 springs variable rate ?
#22
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
Steve, I have F41 too, and its kinda firm in comparsion to FE1 etc. If you can, see if you can mount a strut bar on the front strut towers. Maybe you already have one...not sure. Have a look to see, maybe your Olds could benefit from one.
#23
Yes it came with a STB, it doesnt handle bad, I was just thinking there was probably one better set up for H body than the Olds came with. When we test drove the car we first drove a LS that we liked and I did notice the suspension was stiffer (on LSS) but not alot. This also got me thinking maybe it was "in the middle" suspension wise. We did not drive hard and were not in area to do so plus salesman was in back seat.
This is why I ask about progressive rate. It seems to be it has initial body roll but then less. This is great for ride/handling compromise but not so good for transitional steering or initial driver confidence.
Im not complaining just surprised. We really most likely would not be happy with a harsh ride. It is afterall a large luxury car by todays standards.
Ive been dreaming of a switch that would engage a extra small coilover shock to front control arms from floating for ride comfort to engaged for serious driving. It probably would add an extra 100 lbs to a car plus there would be a reliability/safty factor. Imagine the thing malfuntioning in the middle of a hard cornering situation. LAWSUIT !!!!!!
This is why I ask about progressive rate. It seems to be it has initial body roll but then less. This is great for ride/handling compromise but not so good for transitional steering or initial driver confidence.
Im not complaining just surprised. We really most likely would not be happy with a harsh ride. It is afterall a large luxury car by todays standards.
Ive been dreaming of a switch that would engage a extra small coilover shock to front control arms from floating for ride comfort to engaged for serious driving. It probably would add an extra 100 lbs to a car plus there would be a reliability/safty factor. Imagine the thing malfuntioning in the middle of a hard cornering situation. LAWSUIT !!!!!!
#24
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
Kinda like "shift on the fly" suspension, stiffer more rigid ride under certain driving condition and soft ride on longer journeys. That would be nice.
I've noticed improved handling on cars with shorter springs. Plus it gives you that lowered aggresive look. Not for everyone however. We're you surprised to see the F41 RPO code in the trunk?
I've noticed improved handling on cars with shorter springs. Plus it gives you that lowered aggresive look. Not for everyone however. We're you surprised to see the F41 RPO code in the trunk?
#25
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Originally Posted by DeathRat
BTW: the new RWD Bonnevilles (when they come out) will probally be "G" Bodies again!
#26
Junior Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Waukesha, WI, US
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Steve LS
Yes it came with a STB, it doesnt handle bad, I was just thinking there was probably one better set up for H body than the Olds came with. When we test drove the car we first drove a LS that we liked and I did notice the suspension was stiffer (on LSS) but not alot. This also got me thinking maybe it was "in the middle" suspension wise. We did not drive hard and were not in area to do so plus salesman was in back seat.
This is why I ask about progressive rate. It seems to be it has initial body roll but then less. This is great for ride/handling compromise but not so good for transitional steering or initial driver confidence.
Im not complaining just surprised. We really most likely would not be happy with a harsh ride. It is afterall a large luxury car by todays standards.
Ive been dreaming of a switch that would engage a extra small coilover shock to front control arms from floating for ride comfort to engaged for serious driving. It probably would add an extra 100 lbs to a car plus there would be a reliability/safty factor. Imagine the thing malfuntioning in the middle of a hard cornering situation. LAWSUIT !!!!!!
This is why I ask about progressive rate. It seems to be it has initial body roll but then less. This is great for ride/handling compromise but not so good for transitional steering or initial driver confidence.
Im not complaining just surprised. We really most likely would not be happy with a harsh ride. It is afterall a large luxury car by todays standards.
Ive been dreaming of a switch that would engage a extra small coilover shock to front control arms from floating for ride comfort to engaged for serious driving. It probably would add an extra 100 lbs to a car plus there would be a reliability/safty factor. Imagine the thing malfuntioning in the middle of a hard cornering situation. LAWSUIT !!!!!!
#27
At 85,000 +- now, I'm sure new struts would help. Maybe KYB'* would help that initional roll that makes the left/right transition not the best, I dont know if rear sway bar can help that. It seems to be front end roll. I'll be glad to hear how it works out for you though.
I think it would be nice to lower the car 1.5 but I still cant get used to where that long fornt end ends when parking and it would be close on curbs or mini mart sidewalks when parking. I alway have the car sticking out into the lane a foot farther than everyone else, better safe than sorry. I dont drive it often enough to adapt.
I think it would be nice to lower the car 1.5 but I still cant get used to where that long fornt end ends when parking and it would be close on curbs or mini mart sidewalks when parking. I alway have the car sticking out into the lane a foot farther than everyone else, better safe than sorry. I dont drive it often enough to adapt.
#28
Junior Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Waukesha, WI, US
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm in the same boat - I wouldn't mind lowering about 1", but I have a steep slope to my driveway. I think i would have a problem if I went any lower.
#29
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
An 1" lower wouldn't be bad, but i don't think it would work too well for me, and my driveway,unless i had the rear lowered a lil more. The rear on my car is a lil higher then the front.. IF i ever get a nice sub box in there to pull it down, that would be nice
#30
Originally Posted by DeathRat
Originally Posted by csprague
The PA and 98 are NOT H-Bodies. They are C-Bodies. Very similiar platform, but longer.
In total there are four C-Body cars: Oldsmobile 98, Buick Park Avenue, Cadillac DeVille & Fleetwood.
There are three H-Body cars: Oldsmobile 88, Buick LeSabre, Pontiac Bonneville.
As of the 2000 model year the H-body platform is no more, GM changed the Bonneville and LeSabre over to the new G-Body platform.
In total there are four C-Body cars: Oldsmobile 98, Buick Park Avenue, Cadillac DeVille & Fleetwood.
There are three H-Body cars: Oldsmobile 88, Buick LeSabre, Pontiac Bonneville.
As of the 2000 model year the H-body platform is no more, GM changed the Bonneville and LeSabre over to the new G-Body platform.
Straight from GM:
*VIN DIGITS 4/5 (From LH Side) = CARLINE/SERIES*
PONTIAC 2003 MODELS:
H/X BONNEVILLE SE
H/Y BONNEVILLE SLE
H/Z BONNEVILLE SSEi
BUICK 2003 MODELS:
C/U PARK AVENUE - ULTRA
C/W PARK AVENUE
H/P LESABRE CUSTOM
H/R LESABRE LIMITED
CADILAC 2003 MODELS:
K/D DEVILLE
K/E DEVILLE LUXURY
K/F DEVILLE TOURING
K/* SLS
K/Y STS
OLDSMOBILE 1999 MODELS:
H/C EIGHTY EIGHT 50TH ANNV EDITION
H/N EIGHTY EIGHT
H/Y LSS
OLDSMOBILE 1997 MODELS:
H/C REGENCY
H/N EIGHTY EIGHT
H/Y LSS
OLDSMOBILE 1996 MODELS:
C/X NINETY EIGHT REGENCY ELITE
H/N EIGHTY EIGHT & LS
H/Y LSS
PONTIAC 1986 MODELS:
G/R BONNEVILLE BROUGHAM
G/* BONNEVILLE LE
G/J GRAND PRIX
G/K GRAND PRIX LE
JUST THOUGHT i WOULD INFORM ALL OF YOU ON THIS AGAIN!