1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Theoretical cruise control situation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2006, 08:36 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Lowrider0308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The South
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lowrider0308 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by BillBoost37
Yes Andrew, I read what he wrote and I responded as I saw appropriate.

Most people post a "theoretical" item in hopes that they can find a fix for an actual problem. Therefore if there is an actual problem here, I am asking for the symptoms and mentioning other possible causes of a surge/stuck accelerator type issue.

(lol)
o, so someone thinks there special huh?
Old 03-17-2006, 08:43 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

From a quick glance at the schematic, I'm going to say NO. At least not REMOTELY possible.

You'd have to short TWO wires to ground between the multifunction lever and the PCM at the same time, and the car couldn't ACCELLERATE. It would simply set.

You also have TWO brake inputs to disengage it should one or the other fail.
Don't go by the mistaken conclusion that it happened on a mercedes or ford so it must be possible. I'm quite sure we have a very different circuit design.

Is there an ACTUAL problem here, or not? If NOT, we'll move this topic to General Chat.
Old 03-20-2006, 01:42 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
glorkar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
glorkar is on a distinguished road
Default

wouldn't it be easier to push the cc **** to "off" than shift the car into neutral and turn the key off? Just a thought.
Old 03-20-2006, 03:07 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
wjcollier07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wjcollier07 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by glorkar
wouldn't it be easier to push the cc **** to "off" than shift the car into neutral and turn the key off? Just a thought.
see...now all of us were thinking wayy too complex...why not just turn it off? HA, thats the perfect answer to the entire problem...
Old 03-20-2006, 08:19 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

He was talking about that wire being SHORTED to ground, so it couldn't be turned off. But more than one wire would have to be shorted, among other things. You'd literally have to have 3 or 4 very uncommon failures occur all at once.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
J. Pierpont Finch
1992-1999
1
04-23-2007 10:48 AM
DeeGee96SE
Your Other Rides: Pics & Videos
8
02-22-2005 12:00 PM
MOS95B
Lounge
3
06-14-2004 09:32 AM
OLBlueEyesBonne
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
15
05-17-2004 05:33 PM
MOS95B
Lounge
2
03-10-2004 01:58 PM



Quick Reply: Theoretical cruise control situation



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.