Originally Posted by willwren
You know who did it
We discussed this a couple weeks ago in your own damn apartment, nimrod.
Until someone Rips them apart piece by piece, we're going to just have to form opinions on the best information we have. You've read that they're the same, others have read or seen other sources saying that they're not.
One of these days.......
Hmm..I'm a dummy so I don't remember what you said the differences where. You said "MANY parts in the bottom end showed different" so remind me please, if they've been looked at aparently it will save me a lot of homework.
I think it'd be nice to compare notes on the issue. I've seen GM stating the benefits of their new hot-forged rods as being superior to the "cast" ones of "previous years." Thats a little open to interpretation but take it for what its worth...Once a long time ago I got into a debate with a "member" and managed to find GM directly stating the makeup as being cast for both pistons and rods. This was during my little "down time" and I no longer have the link but I'll see if the other person does. I have many other bits also...This would mean to me that seeing as the other factors are the same, bore-stroke-ect, and they're both the same makeup, maybe they aren't so far off....Like I said though, nobody should do it but if someone has some info maybe we can swap and see where we come out.